Arizona Jury Instruction — 2.3 Consideration Of The Evidence Duty To Follow Instructions Governmental Entity Or Agency Involved In Arizona, when serving as a juror, it is essential to understand the role of a governmental entity or agency involved in a case. Jury Instruction 2.3 specifically addresses the duty of jurors to consider the evidence presented and to follow the instructions given by the court regarding the involvement of such entities. This instruction aims to ensure a fair and impartial trial while highlighting the significance of government involvement in the case. When a case involves a governmental entity or agency, there might be various types of jury instructions relating to the consideration of evidence and the duty to follow instructions. Some examples of different types of such instructions include: 1. Arizona Jury Instruction — 2.3A: Governmental Entity or Agency Defined: This instruction defines a governmental entity or agency for the jury, ensuring a clear understanding of the entities involved. It may explain the roles, responsibilities, and powers of these entities, helping jurors contextualize the evidence presented. 2. Arizona Jury Instruction — 2.3B: Importance of Governmental Entity or Agency Involvement: This instruction emphasizes the significance of the government's involvement in the case. It may explain how the actions or decisions of the government entity or agency contribute to the alleged offense or play a vital role in the trial proceedings, ensuring jurors accurately assess the evidence. 3. Arizona Jury Instruction — 2.3C: Evaluation of Evidence Relating to Governmental Entity or Agency: This instruction provides jurors with specific guidance on evaluating evidence related to a governmental entity or agency. It may highlight the importance of scrutinizing such evidence carefully, considering any additional requirements or standards that come into play when dealing with government entities. 4. Arizona Jury Instruction — 2.3D: Presumption of Official Regularity: This instruction guides the jurors on the presumption of official regularity. It explains that the actions, decisions, or official records of a governmental entity or agency are generally presumed to be regular and lawful unless proven otherwise. Jurors should consider this presumption when evaluating the evidence related to the entity. It is crucial for jurors to understand and follow these instructions to ensure a fair trial. The instructions aim to provide clarity regarding the involvement of governmental entities or agencies, enabling jurors to make informed decisions based on the evidence presented. By considering the evidence and following these instructions, jurors contribute to upholding the principles of justice and fairness in the Arizona legal system.