Arizona Jury Instruction — DeliberatIgnorancenc— - As Proof Of Knowledge is a legal concept that entails a set of instructions given to a jury in Arizona courts to determine a defendant's level of knowledge or intent in a criminal case. This instruction is used when a defendant claims ignorance about certain facts or circumstances related to the alleged crime. It serves as a tool for the jury to evaluate the defendant's credibility and decide whether the defendant's claim of deliberate ignorance should be considered as proof of knowledge. In Arizona, there are two main types of Arizona Jury Instruction — Deliberate Ignorance: 1. General Arizona Jury Instruction — Deliberate Ignorance: This instruction is given to the jury when the prosecution argues that the defendant, although aware of the high probability of certain facts, intentionally avoided confirming these facts to maintain plausible deniability. The instruction informs the jury that they may consider this deliberate ignorance as evidence of the defendant's knowledge and intent. 2. Specific Arizona Jury Instruction — Deliberate Ignorance: This instruction is used when the prosecution asserts that the defendant deliberately avoided learning or seeking knowledge about a specific fact or circumstance directly related to the alleged crime. It informs the jury that the defendant's conscious choice to remain ignorant can be considered as evidence that they acted with knowledge or intent. The purpose of these instructions is to address situations where defendants attempt to shield themselves from criminal liability by feigning ignorance. By providing guidance to the jury on the legal significance of deliberate ignorance, Arizona courts ensure that defendants cannot exploit their lack of knowledge to escape punishment. Keywords: Arizona Jury Instruction, Deliberate Ignorance, Proof of Knowledge, defendant, criminal case, credibility, intent, plausible deniability, deliberate avoidance, conscious choice, liability, legal significance.