Connecticut Jury Instruction — CautionarInstructionio— - Similar Acts Evidence — Rule 40 4(b), F.R.E. is a legal instruction given to the jury during a trial in Connecticut. This instruction is relevant in cases where the prosecution seeks to introduce evidence of similar acts committed by the defendant to establish their propensity to commit the crime they are currently charged with. It falls under Rule 40 4(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence (F.R.E.). The purpose of the cautionary instruction is to guide the jury in using this type of evidence appropriately and not allowing it to unduly influence their decision-making process. The cautionary instruction serves as a reminder to the jury to consider such evidence solely for its limited purpose and not as proof of the defendant's guilt. Different types of Cautionary Instructions related to similar acts evidence may include: 1. Cautionary Instruction to Limit the Use of Similar Acts Evidence: This type of instruction emphasizes to the jury that evidence of similar acts should only be considered for the specific purpose it is introduced, such as showing motive, intent, or common plan, and not as evidence of the defendant's character. 2. Cautionary Instruction on the Weight of Similar Acts Evidence: This instruction guides the jury to evaluate the significance and weight of the similar acts evidence in relation to other evidence presented during the trial. It reminds the jury that the similar acts evidence alone cannot establish guilt and that it should be weighed in conjunction with all other relevant evidence. 3. Cautionary Instruction on Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard: In certain cases, where the prosecution seeks to introduce similar acts evidence as proof of identity or a common scheme, a higher standard of proof, such as "clear and convincing evidence," may be required. The jury is instructed to consider that the standard of proof for this type of evidence is higher than the typical "preponderance of the evidence" standard. 4. Cautionary Instruction for Multiple Similar Acts Evidence: If the prosecution presents multiple instances of similar acts, the jury may receive a specific cautionary instruction that advises them to consider each instance separately and not automatically assume that guilt in one act implies guilt in others. This instruction encourages the jury to evaluate each instance individually and independently. It is important for the jury to understand the limitations and purpose of similar acts evidence, as this type of evidence can greatly impact the outcome of a trial. The cautionary instructions aim to help the jury make an informed and fair decision based on the evidence presented, while recognizing the potential biases associated with the introduction of similar acts evidence.