District of Columbia Agreement Between Arbitrator, Union and Company

• Category: Arbitration and Mediation
• State: Multi-State
• Control #: US-00787BG
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

In this sample form a company and a union agree to retain a certain arbitrator to serve as the regular arbitrator between the company and union, for a term ending on a certain date. The District of Columbia Agreement Between Arbitrator, Union, and Company is a legally binding document that outlines the terms and conditions agreed upon by all parties involved in a dispute resolution process in the District of Columbia. This agreement serves as a framework for resolving conflicts and maintaining harmonious relationships between the union, company, and the appointed arbitrator. One type of District of Columbia Agreement Between Arbitrator, Union, and Company is the Grievance Arbitration Agreement. This agreement is formed when a union member files a grievance against the company for alleged violations of the collective bargaining agreement. The agreement lays out the procedures and guidelines to be followed during the arbitration process, ensuring a fair and impartial resolution. Another type is the Interest Arbitration Agreement. This agreement comes into play when the union and the company are negotiating a new collective bargaining agreement, but they are unable to reach a mutually satisfactory agreement on certain key issues. In such cases, the parties may decide to submit the unresolved issues to an arbitrator who will make a final and binding determination. The agreement outlines the criteria to be considered and the procedures to be followed by the arbitrator in reaching a decision. A third type would be the Voluntary Arbitration Agreement. This agreement is entered into when both the union and the company voluntarily agree to submit a dispute or disagreement to an arbitrator for resolution. Unlike grievance and interest arbitration agreements, the voluntary arbitration agreement is not limited to specific contractual or negotiation-related issues. It can cover a wide range of disputes, such as disputes over contract interpretation, workplace policies, or employment conditions. Regardless of the type, the District of Columbia Agreement Between Arbitrator, Union, and Company typically includes several key elements. It outlines the powers and authorities granted to the arbitrator, establishes the timetable for the arbitration process, and defines the scope of issues that can be arbitrated. The agreement also sets out the rules of conduct for the parties involved and provides guidelines for the confidentiality of the proceedings. Overall, the District of Columbia Agreement Between Arbitrator, Union, and Company is a crucial mechanism for resolving disputes and fostering labor-management relations in the District of Columbia. It ensures that all parties are treated fairly and that their rights and obligations are respected throughout the arbitration process.

The District of Columbia Agreement Between Arbitrator, Union, and Company is a legally binding document that outlines the terms and conditions agreed upon by all parties involved in a dispute resolution process in the District of Columbia. This agreement serves as a framework for resolving conflicts and maintaining harmonious relationships between the union, company, and the appointed arbitrator. One type of District of Columbia Agreement Between Arbitrator, Union, and Company is the Grievance Arbitration Agreement. This agreement is formed when a union member files a grievance against the company for alleged violations of the collective bargaining agreement. The agreement lays out the procedures and guidelines to be followed during the arbitration process, ensuring a fair and impartial resolution. Another type is the Interest Arbitration Agreement. This agreement comes into play when the union and the company are negotiating a new collective bargaining agreement, but they are unable to reach a mutually satisfactory agreement on certain key issues. In such cases, the parties may decide to submit the unresolved issues to an arbitrator who will make a final and binding determination. The agreement outlines the criteria to be considered and the procedures to be followed by the arbitrator in reaching a decision. A third type would be the Voluntary Arbitration Agreement. This agreement is entered into when both the union and the company voluntarily agree to submit a dispute or disagreement to an arbitrator for resolution. Unlike grievance and interest arbitration agreements, the voluntary arbitration agreement is not limited to specific contractual or negotiation-related issues. It can cover a wide range of disputes, such as disputes over contract interpretation, workplace policies, or employment conditions. Regardless of the type, the District of Columbia Agreement Between Arbitrator, Union, and Company typically includes several key elements. It outlines the powers and authorities granted to the arbitrator, establishes the timetable for the arbitration process, and defines the scope of issues that can be arbitrated. The agreement also sets out the rules of conduct for the parties involved and provides guidelines for the confidentiality of the proceedings. Overall, the District of Columbia Agreement Between Arbitrator, Union, and Company is a crucial mechanism for resolving disputes and fostering labor-management relations in the District of Columbia. It ensures that all parties are treated fairly and that their rights and obligations are respected throughout the arbitration process.