The District of Columbia Competence — Unanimous Verdict is a legal concept that pertains to the jurisdiction of the District of Columbia and its requirements for reaching a unanimous decision in certain court cases. This competence relates specifically to criminal trials where a unanimous verdict is necessary for the defendant to be convicted or acquitted. In the District of Columbia, there are different types of competence when it comes to reaching a unanimous verdict: 1. Competence: Competence refers to the mental capacity of an individual to stand trial, where they must be able to understand the charges against them and assist in their defense. If a defendant is found to be incompetent, the trial may be delayed until they regain competence, or they may be subject to psychiatric evaluation and treatment. 2. Unanimous Verdict: A unanimous verdict is one where all members of the jury or the judge (in a bench trial) agree on the guilt or innocence of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt. In the District of Columbia, unanimity is required for all criminal cases, meaning that if even one juror or the judge disagrees, the defendant cannot be convicted. 3. Competency Evaluation: District of Columbia also employs competency evaluations to determine if a defendant is competent to stand trial. These evaluations assess the mental state, understanding of charges, ability to communicate with their attorney, and other factors influencing the defendant's ability to participate effectively in their defense. Competency evaluations may be requested by the defense, the prosecution, or the court itself. 4. Competency Restoration: In cases where a defendant is found to be incompetent, they may undergo competency restoration treatment or rehabilitation until they regain the necessary competence to stand trial. This can involve therapy, medication, or other interventions aimed at improving the individual's mental capacity. It is important to note that the District of Columbia is unique in requiring a unanimous verdict for criminal cases. Many other jurisdictions accept a majority or super majority decision to reach a verdict. Thus, this aspect of the District of Columbia Competence — Unanimous Verdict exemplifies the emphasis on ensuring a high standard of consensus before imposing criminal liability.