A motion to quash asks the judge for an order setting aside or nullifying an action, such as "quashing" service of a summons.
This form is a generic example that may be referred to when preparing such a form for your particular state. It is for illustrative purposes only. Local laws should be consulted to determine any specific requirements for such a form in a particular jurisdiction.
US Legal Forms - one of the greatest libraries of authorized types in the United States - provides a wide array of authorized document themes you can acquire or print. Using the internet site, you can find thousands of types for business and individual uses, sorted by types, states, or search phrases.You will find the latest variations of types just like the District of Columbia Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive within minutes.
If you currently have a monthly subscription, log in and acquire District of Columbia Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive through the US Legal Forms library. The Acquire key will appear on every single develop you perspective. You have accessibility to all previously acquired types inside the My Forms tab of your respective profile.
If you want to use US Legal Forms the very first time, listed below are basic guidelines to obtain started off:
Every design you included with your money does not have an expiration day and it is your own property forever. So, if you wish to acquire or print yet another version, just go to the My Forms portion and then click around the develop you need.
Get access to the District of Columbia Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive with US Legal Forms, the most extensive library of authorized document themes. Use thousands of professional and state-particular themes that fulfill your small business or individual needs and needs.
Burden of Proof Generally, the party seeking to compel compliance with discovery requests, including a subpoena, bears the initial burden of demonstrating the relevance of the sought-after evidence. Counsel must also include in the motion to compel: The specific requests at issue.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(d) requires a judge to modify or quash a subpoena upon timely motion and impose sanctions upon the seeking party if the subpoena subjects a person to ?undue burden.? Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(c) authorizes the judge to quash a criminal subpoena if ?compliance would be ...
A court might, upon a proper motion, quash a subpoena duces tecum if the agency did not have the power to issue the subpoena, the materials sought are not relevant to an authorized investigation, and the items sought are not described with particularity and definiteness, as required by the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. ...
A subpoena may command: (A) production of documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things at a place within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person; and. (B) inspection of premises at the premises to be inspected.
A party or an attorney responsible for the issuance and service of a subpoena for production of books, papers and documents without a deposition shall provide to another party copies of documents so produced upon written request. The party requesting copies shall pay the reasonable costs of reproduction.
Common grounds for filing a motion to quash are that the individual is outside the subpoena range, or that the items to be produced are unavailable within the specified time or at the specified location. Other common grounds for filing a motion to quash include undue burden and expense.
Undue Burden. Rule 45(d)(1) requires parties issuing a subpoena to ?take reasonable steps to avoid imposing an undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena.? Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(d)(1).
Common grounds for objecting to a third-party subpoena for documents include: Improper service. Improper issuance. Vague, ambiguous, and unreasonable requests. Insufficient time to reply. Disclosure of privileged or confidential information. Disclosure of trade secrets. Undue burden or expense. Inaccessible data.
