District of Columbia Jury Instruction — Theft or Embezzlement by Bank Employee provides guidance to the jury regarding the elements and considerations relevant to a case involving theft or embezzlement committed by a bank employee. This instruction ensures that the jury understands the legal requirements and provides a framework for them to evaluate the evidence before reaching a verdict. In cases of theft or embezzlement by a bank employee, there may be different types of instructions depending on the specific circumstances or elements involved. These may include: 1. Instruction on the Elements of Theft or Embezzlement: This instruction outlines the essential elements that need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in order to establish the crime of theft or embezzlement. These elements may include the unlawful taking or conversion of money or property belonging to another, the intent to permanently deprive the rightful owner, and the employment relationship between the defendant and the bank. 2. Instruction on Bank Employee's Fiduciary Duty: This instruction explains to the jury the fiduciary duty that bank employees owe to their employers and customers. It emphasizes the responsibility to act in the best interests of the bank and its clients, refrain from self-dealing or misappropriation, and maintain the highest level of honesty and integrity. 3. Instruction on Proof of Intent: This instruction highlights the importance of proving the defendant's specific intent to commit theft or embezzlement. It clarifies that intent may be inferred from the defendant's actions, knowledge, and surrounding circumstances. The instruction may provide examples of evidence that the jury can consider when evaluating the defendant's intent. 4. Instruction on Defense Arguments: This instruction acknowledges any potential defense arguments that may be raised in a theft or embezzlement case involving a bank employee. It provides guidance to the jury on how to assess these defenses and consider their credibility in light of the evidence presented during the trial. 5. Instruction on Presumption of Innocence and Burden of Proof: This instruction reminds the jury of the fundamental principle that the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. It also explains the burden of proof resting on the prosecution and that the defendant does not have to present evidence or testify. The instruction emphasizes the importance of basing the verdict solely on the evidence presented during the trial. These are some possible types of District of Columbia Jury Instructions relevant to cases involving theft or embezzlement by bank employees. Each instruction aims to ensure a fair trial by providing a clear understanding of the legal elements, the defendant's obligations, and the jury's role in evaluating the evidence.