District of Columbia Motion for Summary Judgment

• Category: Landlord Tenant - Actions
• State: Multi-State
• Control #: US-60929
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

Plaintiff moves to have summary judgment entered against defendant in an action concerning a default on an office lease. A District of Columbia Motion for Summary Judgment is a legal document filed by a party in a civil lawsuit in the District of Columbia requesting the court to rule in their favor without going to trial. This motion is based on the belief that there are no genuine disputes of material facts and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Keywords: District of Columbia, Motion for Summary Judgment, civil lawsuit, court, trial, genuine disputes, material facts, judgment as a matter of law. In the District of Columbia, there are different types of Motions for Summary Judgment that can be filed, depending on the nature of the case. Some common types include: 1. Standard Motion for Summary Judgment: This type of motion is used when the moving party argues that there is no genuine dispute of material facts, and they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law based on the existing evidence and legal arguments. 2. Partial Motion for Summary Judgment: In certain cases, a party may seek a partial summary judgment instead of a complete judgment. This motion is filed when the moving party believes that a particular issue or claim can be resolved in their favor without going to trial, while other issues may still need to be litigated. 3. Cross or Counter Motion for Summary Judgment: If both parties in a lawsuit believe that there are no genuine disputes of material facts, they may file cross or counter motions for summary judgment. Each party argues that judgment should be entered in their favor, and the court then decides which motion should prevail. 4. Default Motion for Summary Judgment: In situations where the opposing party fails to respond to the lawsuit or fails to comply with certain court orders, the moving party may file a motion for summary judgment by default. This motion requests the court to grant judgment in favor of the moving party due to the opponent's lack of response or non-compliance. 5. Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment: If the court previously denied a motion for summary judgment, but new evidence or legal arguments have emerged since then, a party may file a renewed motion for summary judgment. This motion asks the court to reconsider the case and rule in their favor based on the updated information. Overall, a District of Columbia Motion for Summary Judgment is an essential legal tool used to seek a swift resolution in a civil lawsuit without the need for a trial. By analyzing the relevant facts, evidence, and legal arguments, the court can determine whether a genuine dispute exists or if judgment can be granted as a matter of law.

A District of Columbia Motion for Summary Judgment is a legal document filed by a party in a civil lawsuit in the District of Columbia requesting the court to rule in their favor without going to trial. This motion is based on the belief that there are no genuine disputes of material facts and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Keywords: District of Columbia, Motion for Summary Judgment, civil lawsuit, court, trial, genuine disputes, material facts, judgment as a matter of law. In the District of Columbia, there are different types of Motions for Summary Judgment that can be filed, depending on the nature of the case. Some common types include: 1. Standard Motion for Summary Judgment: This type of motion is used when the moving party argues that there is no genuine dispute of material facts, and they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law based on the existing evidence and legal arguments. 2. Partial Motion for Summary Judgment: In certain cases, a party may seek a partial summary judgment instead of a complete judgment. This motion is filed when the moving party believes that a particular issue or claim can be resolved in their favor without going to trial, while other issues may still need to be litigated. 3. Cross or Counter Motion for Summary Judgment: If both parties in a lawsuit believe that there are no genuine disputes of material facts, they may file cross or counter motions for summary judgment. Each party argues that judgment should be entered in their favor, and the court then decides which motion should prevail. 4. Default Motion for Summary Judgment: In situations where the opposing party fails to respond to the lawsuit or fails to comply with certain court orders, the moving party may file a motion for summary judgment by default. This motion requests the court to grant judgment in favor of the moving party due to the opponent's lack of response or non-compliance. 5. Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment: If the court previously denied a motion for summary judgment, but new evidence or legal arguments have emerged since then, a party may file a renewed motion for summary judgment. This motion asks the court to reconsider the case and rule in their favor based on the updated information. Overall, a District of Columbia Motion for Summary Judgment is an essential legal tool used to seek a swift resolution in a civil lawsuit without the need for a trial. By analyzing the relevant facts, evidence, and legal arguments, the court can determine whether a genuine dispute exists or if judgment can be granted as a matter of law.