A motion to quash asks the judge for an order setting aside or nullifying an action, such as "quashing" service of a summons.
This form is a generic example that may be referred to when preparing such a form for your particular state. It is for illustrative purposes only. Local laws should be consulted to determine any specific requirements for such a form in a particular jurisdiction.
A Delaware Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive is a legal document used in the state of Delaware to challenge a subpoena requesting the production of documents that is believed to be burdensome, unfair, or oppressive. This affidavit serves as a written statement, under oath, presenting arguments and evidence supporting the motion to quash the subpoena. The purpose of this affidavit is to convince the court that the subpoena should be invalidated due to its unreasonableness and oppressiveness. By providing a detailed description of the reasons why the subpoena is unreasonable and oppressive, the affine aims to demonstrate that compliance with the subpoena would cause undue burden, hardship, or deprivation of rights. Keywords for this document could include: 1. Delaware Affidavit: The document pertains to legal proceedings in the state of Delaware, indicating that it is specific to the jurisdiction's laws and regulations. 2. Motion to Quash: The affine is requesting the court to annul or invalidate the subpoena in question. 3. Subpoena Ducks Cecum: Refers to a legal order compelling the production of documents or evidence relevant to a court case. 4. Unreasonable: Highlights the argument that the subpoena is excessive, improper, or disproportional in terms of its scope, burden, or request. 5. Oppressive: Suggests that the subpoena places an unfair burden or hardship on the party being subpoenaed, potentially violating their rights or creating an imbalance in the legal proceedings. 6. Grounds to Quash: The specific reasons and legal basis behind the motion to quash the subpoena. It's important to note that while this description provides an overview of a Delaware Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive, there might be variations or subtypes of this affidavit depending on the specific circumstances or legal matters involved in the case.A Delaware Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive is a legal document used in the state of Delaware to challenge a subpoena requesting the production of documents that is believed to be burdensome, unfair, or oppressive. This affidavit serves as a written statement, under oath, presenting arguments and evidence supporting the motion to quash the subpoena. The purpose of this affidavit is to convince the court that the subpoena should be invalidated due to its unreasonableness and oppressiveness. By providing a detailed description of the reasons why the subpoena is unreasonable and oppressive, the affine aims to demonstrate that compliance with the subpoena would cause undue burden, hardship, or deprivation of rights. Keywords for this document could include: 1. Delaware Affidavit: The document pertains to legal proceedings in the state of Delaware, indicating that it is specific to the jurisdiction's laws and regulations. 2. Motion to Quash: The affine is requesting the court to annul or invalidate the subpoena in question. 3. Subpoena Ducks Cecum: Refers to a legal order compelling the production of documents or evidence relevant to a court case. 4. Unreasonable: Highlights the argument that the subpoena is excessive, improper, or disproportional in terms of its scope, burden, or request. 5. Oppressive: Suggests that the subpoena places an unfair burden or hardship on the party being subpoenaed, potentially violating their rights or creating an imbalance in the legal proceedings. 6. Grounds to Quash: The specific reasons and legal basis behind the motion to quash the subpoena. It's important to note that while this description provides an overview of a Delaware Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive, there might be variations or subtypes of this affidavit depending on the specific circumstances or legal matters involved in the case.
