This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs.
Georgia Jury Instruction — 1.1 Duty to Mitigate in General: A Detailed Description The Georgia jury instruction 1.1 explains the concept of "duty to mitigate" in a legal context. This instruction is given to the jury in various civil cases to ensure that plaintiffs fulfill their obligation to minimize damages and losses caused by the defendant's actions. Keywords: Georgia, jury instruction, duty to mitigate, general, types. In personal injury, contract disputes, or any civil case where damages are sought, the jury is instructed on the duty that lies upon the plaintiff to mitigate their losses by taking reasonable actions to minimize the harm or impact caused by the defendant's actions. The purpose of this instruction is to ensure fairness in assessing the damages and to prevent a plaintiff from contributing to their own harm. The duty to mitigate refers to the idea that a plaintiff must take reasonable steps to limit their damages or losses once they become aware or should have reasonably been aware of the harm caused by the defendant. It is essential to note that failure to mitigate may potentially result in a reduction of the damages awarded to the plaintiff. Different types of Georgia Jury Instruction — 1.1 Duty to Mitigate in General: 1.1.1 Duty to Mitigate in Personal Injury Cases: This specific instruction applies to personal injury cases, where the plaintiff has suffered bodily harm due to the defendant's negligence or intentional actions. It reminds the jury that the injured party has a duty to make reasonable efforts to seek medical care, follow prescribed treatment, and actively participate in rehabilitation to minimize the impact and extent of their injuries. 1.1.2 Duty to Mitigate in Contract Disputes: This instruction addresses the duty to mitigate damages in cases involving contractual disputes. It emphasizes that if a party suffers harm due to a breach of contract, they must take reasonable steps to mitigate their losses rather than letting them accumulate. This may include finding alternative sources of income, seeking alternative suppliers or services, or repairing damages in a timely manner. 1.1.3 Duty to Mitigate in Employment Cases: In employment-related cases, this instruction highlights the duty of an employee who has been wrongfully terminated or faced any discrimination to make reasonable efforts to find new employment. It reminds the jury that the plaintiff cannot passively remain unemployed but should diligently seek alternative job opportunities. Failure to mitigate, in such cases, may lead to a reduction in the damages awarded. Overall, the Georgia jury instruction 1.1 Duty to Mitigate in General guides the jury in understanding the plaintiff's duty to minimize damages in various civil cases. It reminds them that while the defendant may be responsible for the harm caused, the plaintiff also has the obligation to actively take steps to mitigate their losses within reason. The different types of instructions within this category address specific scenarios such as personal injury, contract disputes, and employment cases, providing jurors with a comprehensive understanding of this legal principle.
Georgia Jury Instruction — 1.1 Duty to Mitigate in General: A Detailed Description The Georgia jury instruction 1.1 explains the concept of "duty to mitigate" in a legal context. This instruction is given to the jury in various civil cases to ensure that plaintiffs fulfill their obligation to minimize damages and losses caused by the defendant's actions. Keywords: Georgia, jury instruction, duty to mitigate, general, types. In personal injury, contract disputes, or any civil case where damages are sought, the jury is instructed on the duty that lies upon the plaintiff to mitigate their losses by taking reasonable actions to minimize the harm or impact caused by the defendant's actions. The purpose of this instruction is to ensure fairness in assessing the damages and to prevent a plaintiff from contributing to their own harm. The duty to mitigate refers to the idea that a plaintiff must take reasonable steps to limit their damages or losses once they become aware or should have reasonably been aware of the harm caused by the defendant. It is essential to note that failure to mitigate may potentially result in a reduction of the damages awarded to the plaintiff. Different types of Georgia Jury Instruction — 1.1 Duty to Mitigate in General: 1.1.1 Duty to Mitigate in Personal Injury Cases: This specific instruction applies to personal injury cases, where the plaintiff has suffered bodily harm due to the defendant's negligence or intentional actions. It reminds the jury that the injured party has a duty to make reasonable efforts to seek medical care, follow prescribed treatment, and actively participate in rehabilitation to minimize the impact and extent of their injuries. 1.1.2 Duty to Mitigate in Contract Disputes: This instruction addresses the duty to mitigate damages in cases involving contractual disputes. It emphasizes that if a party suffers harm due to a breach of contract, they must take reasonable steps to mitigate their losses rather than letting them accumulate. This may include finding alternative sources of income, seeking alternative suppliers or services, or repairing damages in a timely manner. 1.1.3 Duty to Mitigate in Employment Cases: In employment-related cases, this instruction highlights the duty of an employee who has been wrongfully terminated or faced any discrimination to make reasonable efforts to find new employment. It reminds the jury that the plaintiff cannot passively remain unemployed but should diligently seek alternative job opportunities. Failure to mitigate, in such cases, may lead to a reduction in the damages awarded. Overall, the Georgia jury instruction 1.1 Duty to Mitigate in General guides the jury in understanding the plaintiff's duty to minimize damages in various civil cases. It reminds them that while the defendant may be responsible for the harm caused, the plaintiff also has the obligation to actively take steps to mitigate their losses within reason. The different types of instructions within this category address specific scenarios such as personal injury, contract disputes, and employment cases, providing jurors with a comprehensive understanding of this legal principle.