Guam Jury Instruction - Impeachment - Bad Reputation or Opinion Concerning Truthfulness - May Be Used With 6.1 - 6. 6

• Category: Federal - Jury Instructions - Basic Criminal Claim Instructions
• State: Multi-State
• Control #: US-11CR-6-7
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs.

Guam Jury Instruction Impeachmenten— - Bad Reputation or Opinion Concerning Truthfulness — May Be Used With 1 – 6 6.6: In judicial proceedings, the Guam jury instruction concerning impeachment refers to the act of challenging or undermining the credibility and truthfulness of a witness. Specifically, this jury instruction focuses on the utilization of a witness's bad reputation or unfavorable opinions regarding their truthfulness. This instruction falls under sections 6.1 to 6.6 of the Guam jury instructions, indicating that there are potentially six different types within this category. Here are more detailed descriptions and potential examples of these types: 1. Guam Jury Instruction Impeachmenten— - Bad Reputation: This instruction allows attorneys to introduce evidence showcasing the witness's bad reputation when it comes to truthfulness. This may involve introducing testimony or evidence from other individuals who have knowledge of the witness's reputation for dishonesty. For instance, if a witness is known within the community for frequently lying or being dishonest, the attorney may present witnesses who can testify about this reputation, thereby casting doubt on the witness's credibility. 2. Guam Jury Instruction Impeachmenten— - Opinion Concerning Truthfulness: This instruction pertains to the introduction of an individual's opinion about the witness's general truthfulness. It allows for witnesses' opinions regarding the truthfulness of the person testifying, based on their personal interactions or knowledge. For example, a witness who has had multiple interactions with the testifying individual and can provide their opinion about the person's lack of truthfulness would fall under this instruction. This gives the jury an additional perspective when evaluating the credibility of the witness. It is important to note that while attorneys may utilize these instructions, it is ultimately up to the jury to determine the weight and significance of the evidence presented. These instructions serve as guiding principles for the jury in their evaluation of witness credibility, ensuring a fair and just trial process. In conclusion, the Guam jury instruction regarding impeachment through bad reputation or opinion concerning truthfulness provides attorneys with the opportunity to question the credibility of witnesses by introducing evidence or opinions challenging their truthfulness. The variation in instructions from 6.1 to 6.6 allows for a comprehensive approach in assessing different aspects of a witness's credibility, ensuring a fair trial process in the jurisdiction of Guam.