If a question of paternity of a child is raised, the parties have a right to submit that question to a jury for determination. Therefore, the issue is whether or not defendant is the father of this child. The question of the amount of support for the child or the mother is not for the jury's consideration.
Hawaii has specific instructions to the jury in a paternity case that make it clear that the determination of the amount of support is not a question within the scope of their deliberations. This instruction is crucial to ensure that the jury focuses solely on the issue of establishing paternity and does not become involved in the calculation of financial obligations. The purpose of the Hawaii Instruction to the Jury in a Paternity Case that the Amount of Support is not a Question for the Jury is to educate the jury members about their role in the case and help them understand the limited scope of their decision-making. By clarifying that the jury's duty is solely to determine the question of paternity, this instruction prevents them from considering financial considerations that may bias their judgment or influence their decision. Some specific types or variations of this Hawaii instruction may include: 1. Standard Instruction: This is the general instruction that informs the jury that their responsibility only extends to deciding paternity and that they should not consider or be concerned with the amount of support that may be awarded. 2. Clarification Instruction: In certain cases, the court may provide a more detailed instruction to make it explicitly clear that the jury should not speculate or discuss financial obligations during their deliberations. This instruction may emphasize that it is the court's function, not the jury's, to determine the appropriate amount of support. 3. Reiteration Instruction: At times, the court may choose to repeat or reiterate the instruction throughout the trial proceedings to remind the jury of their limited role regarding financial matters. This reinforces the notion that the jury should focus solely on establishing paternity without being influenced by financial considerations. Overall, the Hawaii Instruction to the Jury in a Paternity Case that the Amount of Support is not a Question for the Jury plays a vital role in ensuring fairness and unbiased decision-making in paternity cases. By clearly assigning the determination of financial obligations to the court, this instruction allows the jury to focus on the crucial task of establishing or disproving paternity, leading to a more just outcome.Hawaii has specific instructions to the jury in a paternity case that make it clear that the determination of the amount of support is not a question within the scope of their deliberations. This instruction is crucial to ensure that the jury focuses solely on the issue of establishing paternity and does not become involved in the calculation of financial obligations. The purpose of the Hawaii Instruction to the Jury in a Paternity Case that the Amount of Support is not a Question for the Jury is to educate the jury members about their role in the case and help them understand the limited scope of their decision-making. By clarifying that the jury's duty is solely to determine the question of paternity, this instruction prevents them from considering financial considerations that may bias their judgment or influence their decision. Some specific types or variations of this Hawaii instruction may include: 1. Standard Instruction: This is the general instruction that informs the jury that their responsibility only extends to deciding paternity and that they should not consider or be concerned with the amount of support that may be awarded. 2. Clarification Instruction: In certain cases, the court may provide a more detailed instruction to make it explicitly clear that the jury should not speculate or discuss financial obligations during their deliberations. This instruction may emphasize that it is the court's function, not the jury's, to determine the appropriate amount of support. 3. Reiteration Instruction: At times, the court may choose to repeat or reiterate the instruction throughout the trial proceedings to remind the jury of their limited role regarding financial matters. This reinforces the notion that the jury should focus solely on establishing paternity without being influenced by financial considerations. Overall, the Hawaii Instruction to the Jury in a Paternity Case that the Amount of Support is not a Question for the Jury plays a vital role in ensuring fairness and unbiased decision-making in paternity cases. By clearly assigning the determination of financial obligations to the court, this instruction allows the jury to focus on the crucial task of establishing or disproving paternity, leading to a more just outcome.
