Dear [Defendant's Name], I hope this letter finds you well. In response to the cross claim asserted by you in the [case name/number], we hereby submit the Answer and Affirmative Defenses on behalf of our client, [Plaintiff's Name]. We aim to provide a comprehensive rebuttal and assert our client's rights under Hawaii law. First and foremost, we deny each and every allegation made in the cross claim. Our client categorically disputes the facts presented and requests the court to dismiss the cross claim in its entirety. Affirmative Defenses: 1. Lack of Standing: Our client asserts that the defendant lacks standing to assert this cross claim as there is no valid relationship between the parties in terms of the subject at hand. Therefore, the cross claim is baseless and without merit. 2. Statute of Limitations: Our client contests that the cross claim is time-barred under Hawaii's statute of limitations. As stipulated by Hawaii Revised Statutes § 657-1, the applicable time limit for filing a cross claim has expired, and any further action is precluded. 3. Failure to State a Claim: The cross claim fails to state a viable cause of action. The allegations presented lack sufficient factual basis and legal support. Our client respectfully requests that the court dismiss the cross claim for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 4. Comparative Negligence: Our client asserts that any alleged damages or injuries suffered by the defendant are a result of their own negligence or misconduct. Hawaii follows the principle of comparative negligence, as outlined in Hawaii Revised Statutes § 663-31. As such, any damages or liability should be apportioned accordingly. Furthermore, if applicable, additional affirmative defenses may include: 5. Waiver: Our client maintains that any rights or claims the defendant seeks to raise have been waived or released by their actions or representations prior to the cross claim being filed. 6. Contributory or Assumption of Risk: Our client asserts that the defendant voluntarily assumed the risks associated with the actions or circumstances leading to the present dispute, thereby diminishing their ability to recover damages. 7. Accord and Satisfaction: Our client asserts that the parties had previously reached a settlement regarding the matters at hand, thereby extinguishing any further claims or cross claims. Please take note that this list of affirmative defenses is not exhaustive and is subject to amendment or addition based on further discovery or legal analysis. In conclusion, we respectfully request the court to dismiss the defendant's cross claim, as it lacks valid grounds under Hawaii law. We will vigorously defend our client's rights and interests at all subsequent stages of this legal proceeding. Thank you for your attention to this matter. We look forward to a fair and just resolution. Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Law Firm] [Contact Information]