Hawaii Jury Instruction — 6.1 Raiding Key Employees is a specific legal instruction given to the jury in cases involving the raiding of key employees in Hawaii. It outlines the legal requirements and considerations that the jury must take into account when deciding the verdict. This instruction is particularly relevant in cases where an employer accuses a former employee or a competing business of engaging in unfair practices by intentionally targeting and recruiting key employees from the company. The purpose of Hawaii Jury Instruction — 6.1 Raiding Key Employees is to help the jury understand the legal standards that must be met in order to establish liability for raiding key employees. The instruction provides clear guidelines for the jurors to assess whether the actions of the defendant meet the legal criteria for liability. Some key keywords relevant to this instruction include: 1. Raiding key employees: Refers to the act of intentionally soliciting or recruiting employees who hold key positions within a company, with the intention of causing harm to the employer. 2. Hawaii: Specifies that the instruction is specific to the laws and regulations of the state of Hawaii. 3. Jury instruction: Indicates that the content is provided to guide the jury's decision-making process during the trial. 4. Liability: Refers to legal responsibility or accountability for the actions undertaken by the defendant. 5. Unfair practices: Relates to actions that are considered unethical or against the norms of the industry, such as intentionally causing harm to a competitor's business. While there may not be different types of Hawaii Jury Instruction — 6.1 Raiding Key Employees, it is worth noting that specific cases may have variations or modifications to this instruction based on the unique circumstances and legal arguments presented by the parties involved. It is essential for the jury to thoroughly understand this instruction as it plays a crucial role in ensuring a fair trial and proper interpretation and application of the law when assessing liability in raiding key employees cases in Hawaii.