Hawaii Jury Instruction — 2.2 Consideration Of The Evidence Duty To Follow Instructions Corporate Party Involved In the state of Hawaii, the jury plays a crucial role in the legal process, and their objective is to carefully consider the evidence presented to them during a trial. Hawaii Jury Instruction — 2.2, also known as "Consideration Of The Evidence Duty To Follow Instructions Corporate Party Involved," provides guidance to the jury on their responsibility to assess the evidence in a fair and impartial manner when a corporate party is involved in the case. When a corporate party is involved in a lawsuit, it is important for the jury to understand their specific duty regarding the evidence presented. The jury must consider all the evidence presented, regardless of the fact that a corporate entity is involved, and evaluate it objectively without any bias or prejudice towards the corporation. The Hawaii Jury Instruction — 2.2 emphasizes that the jury should not favor or discriminate against the corporate party solely based on its legal form. Instead, the jury should focus on the evidence and evaluate it in a manner consistent with the law and the given instructions. Different types of Hawaii Jury Instruction — 2.2 Consideration Of The Evidence Duty To Follow Instructions Corporate Party Involved may exist depending on the specific circumstances and nature of the case. These instructions may include: 1. Standard Instruction: This instruction provides a general guideline for the jury on their duty to consider the evidence presented involving a corporate party. It emphasizes the need for impartiality and unbiased evaluation. 2. Instruction on Corporate Liability: If the case involves corporate liability or wrongdoing, this instruction may outline the specific elements that need to be proven to hold the corporation accountable. 3. Instruction on Corporate Conduct: In cases where the conduct of the corporate party is under scrutiny, this instruction may guide the jury on evaluating the evidence pertaining to the actions or omissions of the corporation. 4. Instruction on Corporate Culture: In certain cases, the jury may need instruction on considering the evidence related to the corporate culture, policies, or practices that may have influenced the conduct of the corporate party. It is essential for the jury to carefully follow these instructions to ensure a fair and just verdict. By considering the evidence without prejudice and applying the law appropriately, the jury can uphold the principles of justice when deciding the fate of a corporate party involved in a legal dispute in Hawaii.