Hawaii Jury Instruction — 1.8.1 Employee Claim Against Employer and Union NACAca v. Sipes - General Instruction provides guidance for cases where an employee asserts a claim against both their employer and their union. This instruction is based on the legal principles established in NACA v. Sides, a landmark United States Supreme Court case. In this context, the term "employee claim" refers to a situation where an individual asserts a legal grievance against both their employer and their union, typically related to employment rights or contract violations. It is essential to understand that this instruction is specific to Hawaii and may have variations in other jurisdictions. The purpose of this general instruction is to outline the essential elements and factors that the jury should consider when deciding such a case. It aims to ensure that the jury fully comprehends the legal standards and principles that apply in employee claims against employers and unions. It is important to note that there may be different versions or variations of Hawaii Jury Instruction — 1.8.1 Employee Claim Against Employer and Union NACAca v. Sipes - General Instruction. These variations might exist due to updates in legal precedents, changes in legislation, or specific factual circumstances of each case. Keywords: 1. Hawaii Jury Instruction 2. Employee Claim Against Employer and Union 3. NACA v. Sides 4. General Instruction 5. Landmark Supreme Court Case 6. Legal Principles 7. Employment Rights 8. Contract Violations 9. Essential Elements 10. Legal Standards 11. Jury Considerations 12. Jurisdiction Variations.