Hawaii Jury Instruction Impeachmenten— - Inconsistent Statemen— - Defendant Testifies With Felony Conviction Keywords: Hawaii, jury instruction, impeachment, inconsistent statement, defendant, testifies, felony conviction. Description: In the state of Hawaii, during a criminal trial, the jury is provided with specific instructions to guide their deliberations. One such instruction is the "Hawaii Jury Instruction Impeachmenten— - Inconsistent Statemen— - Defendant Testifies With Felony Conviction." This instruction addresses the situation when a defendant with a felony conviction on their record testifies during the trial but provides inconsistent statements. When a defendant takes the witness stand and presents testimony that contradicts prior statements made during the trial or investigations, their credibility and truthfulness may come into question. The Hawaii jury instruction provided in this circumstance helps guide jurors on how to evaluate the defendant's credibility and weigh the testimony against the inconsistency. The purpose of this specific instruction is to advise the jury that they have the right to consider the defendant's prior felony conviction and inconsistent statements when assessing the credibility of the defendant's testimony. The jury is instructed to view the defendant's testimony with caution, recognizing that the inconsistency might undermine the defendant's credibility and cast doubt on their overall veracity. Different types of Hawaii Jury Instruction Impeachmenten— - Inconsistent Statemen— - Defendant Testifies With Felony Conviction can include variations that arise from specific circumstances in each case, such as: 1. Inconsistent statements related to the events surrounding the alleged crime: This type of impeachment instruction comes into play when the defendant provides contradictory accounts or explanations about the actions, timing, or sequence of events related to the alleged crime. Jurors are told to carefully assess the defendant's credibility and determine if the inconsistencies affect their overall believability. 2. Inconsistent statements regarding the defendant's involvement: In some cases, the defendant may provide differing explanations or deny any involvement in the alleged crime at different points during the trial. This type of impeachment instruction instructs the jury to evaluate the defendant's credibility based on their inconsistent statements and determine if it affects their reliability as a witness. 3. Inconsistent statements about the defendant's intentions or motives: Sometimes, the defendant may provide contrasting reasons or motivations as to why they allegedly committed the crime. This instruction advises the jury to scrutinize the inconsistency between these statements and weigh its impact on the defendant's credibility. It is important to note that the specific jury instructions may vary case by case, as they are tailored to the facts and circumstances presented. These instructions help ensure that jurors make informed and fair decisions based on all the evidence, including any inconsistent statements made by defendants with felony convictions testifying during the trial.