This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs.
Hawaii Jury Instruction — Aiding AnAbettingin— - Agency - 18 USC Sect. 2 In the state of Hawaii, the jury instruction related to aiding and abetting through agency is governed by 18 USC Section 2. This instruction is applicable when a defendant is accused of aiding, abetting, counseling, commanding, inducing, or procuring the commission of a federal offense by another person. Under this jury instruction, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant intentionally associated themselves with the criminal activity and willfully participated in the venture with the intent to encourage or facilitate its commission. The defendant's aid or assistance can be in the form of advice, counsel, encouragement, or physical presence. Furthermore, the jury must be informed that the defendant acted with knowledge of the unlawful purpose of the primary participant and had the intent to help or contribute to the commission of the offense. It is not necessary for the defendant to have had the same intent or knowledge as the primary participant, as long as they were aware of the general criminal objective and willingly assisted in its accomplishment. It is important to distinguish between different types of aiding and abetting through agency cases as they may carry various nuances and legal implications. Some possible variations of Hawaii Jury Instruction — Aiding AnAbettingin— - Agency - 18 USC Sect. 2 include: 1. Aiding and Abetting a Federal Offense: This instruction applies when the defendant assists another person in committing a federal offense, knowing the specific intended outcome, and actively contributing to its success. 2. Conspiracy through Agency: This instruction is relevant when the defendant participated in a conspiracy, agreeing with others to commit a federal offense, and took specific actions to further the conspiracy's objectives, even if they did not directly commit the offense themselves. 3. Aiding and Abetting through Commanding: This instruction is applicable when the defendant exercises authority or control over another person and commands or coerces them to commit a federal offense. The defendant must have both the intention to aid and abet the offense and the authority to compel the primary participant's actions. In conclusion, the Hawaii Jury Instruction — Aiding AnAbettingin— - Agency - 18 USC Sect. 2 provides guidance to the jury on establishing the defendant's involvement in aiding, abetting, counseling, commanding, inducing, or procuring the commission of a federal offense by another person. It emphasizes the importance of intent, knowledge, and active participation in facilitating the offense. Different variations of this instruction may be applicable based on the specific circumstances of the case.
Hawaii Jury Instruction — Aiding AnAbettingin— - Agency - 18 USC Sect. 2 In the state of Hawaii, the jury instruction related to aiding and abetting through agency is governed by 18 USC Section 2. This instruction is applicable when a defendant is accused of aiding, abetting, counseling, commanding, inducing, or procuring the commission of a federal offense by another person. Under this jury instruction, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant intentionally associated themselves with the criminal activity and willfully participated in the venture with the intent to encourage or facilitate its commission. The defendant's aid or assistance can be in the form of advice, counsel, encouragement, or physical presence. Furthermore, the jury must be informed that the defendant acted with knowledge of the unlawful purpose of the primary participant and had the intent to help or contribute to the commission of the offense. It is not necessary for the defendant to have had the same intent or knowledge as the primary participant, as long as they were aware of the general criminal objective and willingly assisted in its accomplishment. It is important to distinguish between different types of aiding and abetting through agency cases as they may carry various nuances and legal implications. Some possible variations of Hawaii Jury Instruction — Aiding AnAbettingin— - Agency - 18 USC Sect. 2 include: 1. Aiding and Abetting a Federal Offense: This instruction applies when the defendant assists another person in committing a federal offense, knowing the specific intended outcome, and actively contributing to its success. 2. Conspiracy through Agency: This instruction is relevant when the defendant participated in a conspiracy, agreeing with others to commit a federal offense, and took specific actions to further the conspiracy's objectives, even if they did not directly commit the offense themselves. 3. Aiding and Abetting through Commanding: This instruction is applicable when the defendant exercises authority or control over another person and commands or coerces them to commit a federal offense. The defendant must have both the intention to aid and abet the offense and the authority to compel the primary participant's actions. In conclusion, the Hawaii Jury Instruction — Aiding AnAbettingin— - Agency - 18 USC Sect. 2 provides guidance to the jury on establishing the defendant's involvement in aiding, abetting, counseling, commanding, inducing, or procuring the commission of a federal offense by another person. It emphasizes the importance of intent, knowledge, and active participation in facilitating the offense. Different variations of this instruction may be applicable based on the specific circumstances of the case.