Iowa Jury Instruction - 1.5.1 Americans With Disabilities Act 42 USC Sect. 12101 - 12117 Disparate Treatment Claim

• Category: Federal - Jury Instructions - Adverse Employment Action
• State: Multi-State
• Control #: US-11CF-1-5-1
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs.

Iowa Jury Instruction — 1.5.1 Americans With Disabilities Act 42 USC Sect. 12101 – 12117 Disparate Treatment Claim: Detailed Description Keywords: Iowa Jury Instruction, Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 USC Sect. 12101 – 12117, Disparate Treatment Claim The Iowa Jury Instruction — 1.5.1 addresses the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) and specifically focuses on disparate treatment claims under the Act. This instruction provides guidance to the jury on how to evaluate cases involving alleged discrimination against individuals with disabilities based on unequal or discriminatory treatment. The ADA, codified under 42 USC Sect. 12101 – 12117, prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in various aspects of life, including employment, public accommodations, and government services. Disparate treatment claims arise when an individual alleges that they have been treated less favorably solely because of their disability. The purpose of the Iowa Jury Instruction — 1.5.1 is to outline the specific elements that need to be considered by the jury in determining whether a disparate treatment claim under the ADA is valid. Some of the elements that may be covered include: 1. Treatment Disparity: The instruction helps the jury understand the concept of disparate treatment and distinguishes it from disparate impact. It explains that the claimant must prove that they were treated differently compared to others in a similar situation solely due to their disability. 2. Essential Job Functions: The instruction may outline the importance of considering the essential functions of a job and whether the claimant, with or without reasonable accommodation, could perform those functions. This assessment is relevant in determining whether the claimant's disability was a substantial factor in the alleged discriminatory treatment. 3. Intentional Discrimination: The instruction might address the burden of proof, requiring the claimant to demonstrate that the discrimination was intentional or based on discriminatory animus. This element typically requires evidence showing that the adverse treatment was motivated by the claimant's disability. 4. Reasonable Accommodation: The instruction may address the duty of the employer to provide reasonable accommodations to individuals with disabilities, and how the failure to provide such accommodations could contribute to a disparate treatment claim. It is important to note that specific variations or subtypes of the Iowa Jury Instruction — 1.5.1 may exist. These variations might encompass different factual scenarios or focus on particular aspects of the ADA disparate treatment claim, providing tailored instructions to juries based on the specific circumstances of each case. Overall, the Iowa Jury Instruction — 1.5.1 Americans With Disabilities Act 42 USC Sect. 12101 – 12117 Disparate Treatment Claim serves as a comprehensive guide for juries to assess disparate treatment claims under the ADA. It ensures that the jury is properly informed about the legal criteria and elements to consider when determining whether unlawful discrimination occurred based on an individual's disability.