Iowa Jury Instruction — 4.4.3 Rule 10(b— - 5(c) Fraudulent Practice or Course of Dealing Stockbroker Churning — Violation of Blue Sky Law and Breach of Fiduciary Duty In the state of Iowa, the Iowa Jury Instruction 4.4.3 Rule 10(b) — 5(c) addresses the fraudulent practices or course of dealing known as stockbroker churning, which is considered a violation of both the Blue Sky Law and the fiduciary duty of a stockbroker. This detailed instruction aims to provide jurors with a comprehensive understanding of the relevant legal issues and the standard by which to evaluate and decide a case involving stockbroker churning. Stockbroker churning occurs when a stockbroker excessively trades securities in a client's account solely for the purpose of generating commissions or fees, rather than acting in the client's best interest. Iowa's Blue Sky Law specifically regulates securities transactions and aims to protect investors from fraudulent practices, ensuring that securities are sold in a manner consistent with the public interest. Additionally, stockbrokers owe a fiduciary duty to their clients, meaning they have a legal obligation to act in their clients' best interests and disclose any conflicts of interest. The Iowa Jury Instruction 4.4.3 Rule 10(b) — 5(c) further breaks down the elements that need to be proven to establish a claim of fraudulent practice or course of dealing stockbroker churning and its violation of the Blue Sky Law and breach of fiduciary duty. Jurors will be instructed on the essential elements of stockbroker churning, including: 1. Excessive trading: The plaintiff must prove that the stockbroker engaged in excessive trading, meaning there was an unreasonable number of transactions in the client's account relative to the size and nature of the account. 2. Sci enter: The plaintiff must establish that the stockbroker acted with intent to defraud or with reckless disregard for the client's interests. 3. Material misrepresentations or omissions: The plaintiff must demonstrate that the stockbroker made material misrepresentations or omitted material facts related to the transactions, which affected the client's decision-making process. 4. Causation: The plaintiff must show that the stockbroker's churning practices directly caused financial harm to the client. If the jury finds that these elements have been proven, the stockbroker may be held liable for violating the Blue Sky Law and breaching their fiduciary duty. The jury instruction allows for a thorough examination of the evidence and ensures that the jurors are knowledgeable about the legal standards guiding their decision-making process. Different types of fraudulent practice or course of dealing stockbroker churning cases may exist with varying circumstances. These could include cases involving different securities, market conditions, client account sizes, or specific misrepresentations made by the stockbroker. It is crucial for the jury to evaluate each case independently, considering the unique facts and evidence presented. In conclusion, the Iowa Jury Instruction 4.4.3 Rule 10(b) — 5(c) provides a detailed guide for jurors to understand and assess claims of fraudulent practice or course of dealing stockbroker churning, its violation of the Blue Sky Law, and the breach of fiduciary duty. By considering the keywords relevant to this topic, jurors will reach an informed decision based on the evidence presented in court.