An Idaho Answer to Officer's Complaint for Continuation of Salary Benefit is a response to a complaint filed in a court of law regarding the continuation of salary benefits for an officer of a company or organization. In the response, the defendant must provide evidence that they are entitled to the salary benefits and that the plaintiff's claim is unfounded. The Idaho Answer to Officer's Complaint for Continuation of Salary Benefit must include the name of the defendant and a brief description of the events leading up to the complaint. It must also include information regarding the defendant's status as an officer and any other relevant facts or arguments that could support the defendant's claim to the salary benefits. There are three main types of Idaho Answer to Officer's Complaint for Continuation of Salary Benefit: (1) a general answer, (2) an answer with affirmative defenses, and (3) an answer with a counterclaim. A general answer is a response to the complaint that denies any allegations of wrongdoing and relies on the defendant's status as an officer to support the claim for salary benefits. An answer with affirmative defenses raises additional arguments as to why the plaintiff's complaint should be dismissed or why the defendant should be granted the salary benefits. An answer with a counterclaim includes a claim by the defendant, either against the plaintiff or against a third party, for damages or other relief related to the salary benefits.