Idaho Jury Instruction — 1.2 With Counterclaim By Defendant is a legal instruction given to jurors in the state of Idaho during a trial that involves a counterclaim filed by the defendant. This instruction guides the jury on how to consider and evaluate the defendant's counterclaim while also considering the plaintiff's original claim. The purpose of Idaho Jury Instruction — 1.2 With Counterclaim By Defendant is to ensure that jurors understand the legal framework surrounding a counterclaim and how it affects the overall case. It provides guidance on how to weigh the evidence presented by both parties and how to render a fair and impartial verdict. Some relevant keywords associated with Idaho Jury Instruction — 1.2 With Counterclaim By Defendant are: 1. Counterclaim: This refers to a claim made by the defendant in response to the plaintiff's original claim. It is a legal argument asserting that the defendant has suffered harm as a result of the plaintiff's actions. 2. Jury instruction: These are legal guidelines provided by the court to jurors to help them understand the law and apply it to the case they are deliberating on. 3. Defendant: The party being accused or sued in a court case. 4. Plaintiff: The party bringing the lawsuit against the defendant. 5. Trial: The formal legal process where parties present evidence and arguments before a judge and jury to resolve a dispute. 6. Verdict: The final decision made by the jury on the outcome of a trial, determining whether the defendant is liable for the plaintiff's claim and whether the defendant's counterclaim is valid. It's important to note that while Idaho Jury Instruction — 1.2 With Counterclaim By Defendant is a standard instruction, it may have variations or additional instructions depending on the specific circumstances of the case. These variations may include specific elements or requirements that need to be met for the counterclaim to be considered valid. In summary, Idaho Jury Instruction — 1.2 With Counterclaim By Defendant is a crucial instruction that outlines how jurors should evaluate and consider a defendant's counterclaim while deliberating on a case. It ensures a fair and comprehensive consideration of both the plaintiff's claim and the defendant's counterclaim in reaching a verdict.