Illinois Jury Instruction — 6.6.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense is a legal instruction given to the jury in civil cases where the issue of comparative negligence arises. This instruction guides the jury in evaluating the responsibility or fault of each party involved in the lawsuit. Comparative negligence is a legal principle used in tort law to determine the degree of fault attributed to each party in a negligence claim. In Illinois, comparative negligence is a partial defense that allows the jury to assess and allocate fault between the plaintiff and the defendant. The purpose of Illinois Jury Instruction — 6.6.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense is to inform the jury about the concept of comparative negligence and how it affects the determination of damages in the case. The instruction outlines the standard by which the jury should determine the percentage of fault for each party involved. The specific language of Illinois Jury Instruction — 6.6.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense may vary depending on the circumstances of the case and the specific version of the instruction being used. However, some possible variations and subtypes of this instruction include: 1. Pure Comparative Negligence: Under this type, the jury is instructed to assign a percentage of fault to each party regardless of the level of their respective negligence. The plaintiff's damages are then reduced by their assigned percentage of fault. 2. Modified Comparative Negligence (50% Bar Rule): In this situation, the jury is instructed to allocate fault between the plaintiff and the defendant. The plaintiff is only eligible to recover damages if their percentage of fault is determined to be less than or equal to the defendant's percentage of fault. If the plaintiff's fault exceeds the defendant's, they are barred from recovering any damages. 3. Modified Comparative Negligence (51% Bar Rule): Similar to the 50% bar rule, but the plaintiff is barred from recovering damages if their fault is found to be equal to or greater than the defendant's fault, exceeding 51%. The purpose of these variations is to balance the interests of both the plaintiff and the defendant when apportioning fault. By considering the respective negligence of each party involved, the jury can arrive at a fair and just verdict regarding liability and damages. It is crucial for the jury to understand the specifics of Illinois Jury Instruction — 6.6.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense, as it provides guidelines for their decision-making process and affects the ultimate outcome of the case. This instruction ensures the equitable distribution of responsibility and promotes a fair resolution in civil disputes involving negligence claims in Illinois.