Illinois Jury Instruction Impeachmenten— - Inconsistent Statement and Felony Conviction — Defendant Testifies With No Felony Conviction In Illinois criminal trials, the jury instruction on impeachment using inconsistent statements and felony convictions is an important part of ensuring a fair and just trial. This instruction allows the jury to scrutinize the credibility of the defendant's testimony when there are inconsistencies in their statements or prior felony convictions. When a defendant takes the stand and testifies in their own defense, the jury is instructed to consider the defendant's prior statements made outside of court. If the defendant's current testimony contradicts their previous statements, the jury may choose to question the defendant's honesty or reliability. Additionally, the instruction addresses the situation where a defendant has a prior felony conviction. If the defendant testifies on their own behalf, but there is no evidence or proof of any prior felony conviction, the jury is directed to disregard any mention of the defendant's past criminal history. There are several variations of this jury instruction, depending on the specific circumstances of the case. Some potential variations include: 1. Illinois Jury Instruction — Inconsistent Statement: This instruction focuses solely on the aspect of inconsistent statements made by the defendant. It guides the jury on how to evaluate the credibility of the defendant's testimony when it conflicts with prior statements. 2. Illinois Jury Instruction — Felony Conviction: This instruction addresses the situation where the defendant has a prior felony conviction, regardless of whether they testify or not. It informs the jury that a previous conviction does not automatically make the defendant guilty of the current charges and should not influence their decision. 3. Illinois Jury Instruction — Defendant Testifies With No Felony Conviction — Other Conviction: This variation is used when the defendant testifies, but has a conviction for a different offense rather than a felony. In this case, the jury is instructed to consider the defendant's previous conviction only as it relates to their credibility, not as evidence of guilt for the current charges. It is crucial for jurors to understand and carefully follow these instructions in order to weigh the defendant's testimony and make an informed decision. By considering any inconsistencies in the defendant's statements and properly evaluating the impact of prior convictions, the jury can effectively assess the defendant's credibility and arrive at a fair verdict.