Illinois Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict, or in the Alternative, for a New Trial - for prejudicial statements at trial

• Category: Civil Procedure - Motions - Sample Motions
• State: Multi-State
• Control #: US-MOT-01422
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This is a multi-state form covering the subject matter of the title. Illinois Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict, or in the Alternative, for a New Trial, is a legal action that can be filed by the defendant or plaintiff in a trial when they believe that prejudicial statements were made during the trial, which may have influenced the jury's decision. This motion seeks to have the verdict set aside and either enter a judgment in favor of the moving party or order a new trial. In Illinois, there are different types of motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or in the alternative, for a new trial specifically related to prejudicial statements at trial. These include: 1. Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict: This motion, commonly referred to as NOV, requests the court to disregard the jury's verdict entirely and instead enter a judgment in favor of the moving party. It argues that the prejudicial statements introduced during the trial were so significant that no reasonable jury could have reached the same decision. 2. Motion for a New Trial: Alternatively, this motion seeks to have the jury's verdict set aside and requests a new trial to be conducted. It essentially argues that the prejudicial statements introduced during the trial unfairly prejudiced the outcome, making it necessary to start the trial process anew with a different jury. Both of these motions can be utilized when prejudicial statements are made during the trial, regardless of whether they were made by the opposing party, witnesses, or even the judge. These statements may involve explicit or implicit bias, discriminatory language, or any form of statement or evidence that could affect the impartiality of the jury and compromise a fair trial. When filing these motions, it is crucial to provide detailed evidence and legal arguments supporting the claim of prejudicial statements and their influence on the verdict. This may involve citing specific statements, witnesses, or incidents during the trial which demonstrate the prejudice and its impact on the jury's decision. In summary, the Illinois Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict, or in the Alternative, for a New Trial, related to prejudicial statements at trial, allows parties to challenge the fairness of a verdict based on the introduction of such statements. These motions aim to either require the court to enter a judgment contrary to the jury's verdict or to order a new trial, with the intention of achieving a fair and unbiased resolution.

Illinois Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict, or in the Alternative, for a New Trial, is a legal action that can be filed by the defendant or plaintiff in a trial when they believe that prejudicial statements were made during the trial, which may have influenced the jury's decision. This motion seeks to have the verdict set aside and either enter a judgment in favor of the moving party or order a new trial. In Illinois, there are different types of motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or in the alternative, for a new trial specifically related to prejudicial statements at trial. These include: 1. Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict: This motion, commonly referred to as NOV, requests the court to disregard the jury's verdict entirely and instead enter a judgment in favor of the moving party. It argues that the prejudicial statements introduced during the trial were so significant that no reasonable jury could have reached the same decision. 2. Motion for a New Trial: Alternatively, this motion seeks to have the jury's verdict set aside and requests a new trial to be conducted. It essentially argues that the prejudicial statements introduced during the trial unfairly prejudiced the outcome, making it necessary to start the trial process anew with a different jury. Both of these motions can be utilized when prejudicial statements are made during the trial, regardless of whether they were made by the opposing party, witnesses, or even the judge. These statements may involve explicit or implicit bias, discriminatory language, or any form of statement or evidence that could affect the impartiality of the jury and compromise a fair trial. When filing these motions, it is crucial to provide detailed evidence and legal arguments supporting the claim of prejudicial statements and their influence on the verdict. This may involve citing specific statements, witnesses, or incidents during the trial which demonstrate the prejudice and its impact on the jury's decision. In summary, the Illinois Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict, or in the Alternative, for a New Trial, related to prejudicial statements at trial, allows parties to challenge the fairness of a verdict based on the introduction of such statements. These motions aim to either require the court to enter a judgment contrary to the jury's verdict or to order a new trial, with the intention of achieving a fair and unbiased resolution.