Indiana Jury Instruction - 2.2 Consideration Of The Evidence Duty To Follow Instructions Corporate Party Involved

• Category: Federal - Jury Instructions - Basic Civil Claim Instructions
• State: Multi-State
• Control #: US-11CB-2-2
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs.

Indiana Jury Instruction — 2.2 Consideration Of The Evidence Duty To Follow Instructions Corporate Party Involved In Indiana, the jury instruction 2.2 deals with the duty of the jury to consider the evidence presented during a trial and follow the instructions given by the court. This instruction becomes particularly relevant when a corporate party is involved in a legal proceeding. The purpose of this instruction is to ensure that the jurors understand their responsibilities in evaluating the evidence and making unbiased judgments. The instruction emphasizes the significance of jurors objectively examining all the evidence presented in court, including witness testimonies, documents, exhibits, and any other relevant materials. Jurors must carefully consider the credibility and reliability of each piece of evidence before reaching a verdict. They should not favor one party over another based on personal biases, beliefs, or sympathies. When a corporate party is involved, additional considerations come into play. The instruction highlights that corporations, as legal entities, enjoy certain rights and obligations and should be evaluated accordingly. Jurors must recognize that corporations can act through their employees, agents, or representatives. Therefore, they should carefully assess the actions, intentions, and knowledge of both individuals and the corporation as a whole. The instruction acknowledges that corporations can be held responsible for their actions, just like individuals. However, it is crucial for jurors to distinguish between the culpability of the corporation as an entity and that of the individual employees involved. They should not hold the corporate entity liable for the personal misconduct of its employees unless it can be proven that the corporation condoned, encouraged, or directly participated in the wrongful behavior. Different types of Indiana Jury Instruction — 2.2 Consideration Of The Evidence Duty To Follow Instructions Corporate Party Involved may vary based on the specific circumstances of the case. Examples could include: 1. Instruction for Product Liability Cases: In cases involving a corporate defendant facing product liability claims, the instruction may guide the jurors on evaluating evidence related to product design, manufacturing processes, warnings, and potential negligence. 2. Instruction for Employment Discrimination Cases: When a corporate entity is accused of employment discrimination, the instruction may provide guidance on considering evidence related to company policies, management practices, and actions taken by individual employees that may indicate discriminatory intent. 3. Instruction for Corporate Fraud Cases: In cases involving allegations of corporate fraud, the instruction may direct the jurors to evaluate evidence related to financial records, transactions, internal controls, and the corporation's knowledge or involvement in deceptive practices. These are just a few examples of how the Indiana Jury Instruction — 2.2 Consideration Of The Evidence Duty To Follow Instructions Corporate Party Involved can be tailored to different types of cases. The goal is to ensure that the jury remains impartial, carefully evaluates the evidence, and renders a fair verdict based on the facts presented in court.