Kansas Quality Comparison Survey

State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-04045BG
Format:
Word; 
Rich Text
Instant download

Description

This form is a template for use in a survey to compare the quality of a product or service.
Free preview
  • Preview Quality Comparison Survey
  • Preview Quality Comparison Survey

How to fill out Quality Comparison Survey?

Are you currently in a circumstance where you frequently require documents for potential organizational or personal purposes.

There is a range of official document templates accessible online, but sourcing reliable forms isn’t always easy.

US Legal Forms provides an extensive collection of form templates, including the Kansas Quality Comparison Survey, designed to meet federal and state requirements.

Once you find the suitable form, click Acquire now.

Choose the pricing plan you prefer, provide the necessary information to establish your account, and complete the payment using PayPal or a credit/debit card.

  1. If you are already acquainted with the US Legal Forms website and have an account, simply Log In.
  2. Once logged in, you can download the Kansas Quality Comparison Survey template.
  3. If you do not have an account and wish to start using US Legal Forms, follow these instructions.
  4. Locate the form you need and verify that it corresponds to the correct city/state.
  5. Utilize the Preview button to review the form.
  6. Examine the description to confirm that you have chosen the correct form.
  7. If the form isn’t what you’re looking for, use the Lookup field to find the form that suits your needs.

Form popularity

FAQ

Clinical correlates of KCCQ scores As described, all KCCQ scores are scaled from 0 to 100 and frequently summarized in 25-point ranges, where scores represent health status as follows: 0 to 24: very poor to poor; 25 to 49: poor to fair; 50 to 74: fair to good; and 75 to 100: good to excellent.

The Clinical Summary Score (CSS) of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), a patient-reported outcome instrument, provides a measure of symptoms and physical limitations associated with heart failure.

As described, all KCCQ scores are scaled from 0 to 100 and frequently summarized in 25-point ranges, where scores represent health status as follows: 0 to 24: very poor to poor; 25 to 49: poor to fair; 50 to 74: fair to good; and 75 to 100: good to excellent.

Conclusions: The KCCQ-12 is a valid, reproducible, responsive instrument for assessing disease-specific health status among patients with heart failure, with properties and performance similar to the full KCCQ but with a substantially reduced response burden.

In the KCCQ-12, responses are given on a Likert scale that for each individual item is scored on a scale of 0100 with higher scores indicating better health. Items are grouped into the four domains; Physical limitation, Symptom frequency, Quality of life, and Social limitation.

In the KCCQ, the total symptom score (TSS) quantifies the symptom frequency and severity, KCCQ clinical summary score (CSS) includes the physical function and symptoms domains, and KCCQ overall summary score (OSS) is derived from total symptom score, physical function, quality of life, and social function.

The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a 23-item self-administered questionnaire developed to independently measure the patient's perception of their health status, which includes heart failure symptoms, impact on physical and social function, and how their heart failure impacts their quality of life (

The KCCQ has been shown to be valid, reproducible, and sensitive to clinical change in patients with systolic dysfunction, HF with preserved ejection fraction, and valvular heart disease. Moreover, patients' KCCQ scores are independently prognostic of survival, HF admissions, and costs.

The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a 23-item self-administered questionnaire developed to independently measure the patient's perception of their health status, which includes heart failure symptoms, impact on physical and social function, and how their heart failure impacts their quality of life (

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies

Kansas Quality Comparison Survey