A motion to quash asks the judge for an order setting aside or nullifying an action, such as "quashing" service of a summons.
This form is a generic example that may be referred to when preparing such a form for your particular state. It is for illustrative purposes only. Local laws should be consulted to determine any specific requirements for such a form in a particular jurisdiction.
A Maryland Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive is a legal document filed in the state of Maryland when an individual or entity believes that a subpoena issued against them is burdensome, unjust, or seeks irrelevant or unnecessary information. This affidavit is used to support a motion to have the subpoena quashed or set aside. When drafting this affidavit, it is important to provide detailed information explaining why the subpoena should be quashed. This can include highlighting specific reasons such as: 1. Unreasonable and Oppressive Nature of the Subpoena: Detail how the subpoena places an undue burden on the party by requiring a significant amount of time, effort, or resources to comply. Explain how it disrupts normal business operations or personal affairs. Keywords: unreasonable, burdensome, oppressive, undue burden, disrupt, disrupts business operations, disrupts personal affairs. 2. Irrelevance of the Requested Documents or Information: Outline why the documents or information sought by the subpoena are not relevant to the case at hand. Provide arguments supporting your position that the requested materials do not contribute to the resolution of the legal matter. Keywords: irrelevant, not relevant, lack of relevance, unrelated to the case, unnecessary. 3. Availability of the Requested Information Elsewhere: Demonstrate that the documents or information sought by the subpoena can be obtained from other sources, making the subpoena unnecessary. Keywords: available elsewhere, obtainable through alternative means, obtainable through less intrusive methods. 4. Overreach or Abuse of Process: Highlight any potential abuse of the legal process, improper motive, or excessive breadth in the scope of the subpoena. Explain how it exceeds what is reasonable or customary in similar cases. Keywords: abuse of process, improper motive, excessive breadth, overreach, unreasonable scope. Keep in mind that there might be variations or different types of this affidavit based on the type of legal matter or specific circumstances. The specifics of the case and the relevant laws in Maryland should be considered while tailoring the language and arguments in the affidavit to address the unique concerns and requirements of the situation. It is always advisable to consult with an attorney familiar with Maryland law to ensure proper compliance and effectiveness of legal documents.
A Maryland Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive is a legal document filed in the state of Maryland when an individual or entity believes that a subpoena issued against them is burdensome, unjust, or seeks irrelevant or unnecessary information. This affidavit is used to support a motion to have the subpoena quashed or set aside. When drafting this affidavit, it is important to provide detailed information explaining why the subpoena should be quashed. This can include highlighting specific reasons such as: 1. Unreasonable and Oppressive Nature of the Subpoena: Detail how the subpoena places an undue burden on the party by requiring a significant amount of time, effort, or resources to comply. Explain how it disrupts normal business operations or personal affairs. Keywords: unreasonable, burdensome, oppressive, undue burden, disrupt, disrupts business operations, disrupts personal affairs. 2. Irrelevance of the Requested Documents or Information: Outline why the documents or information sought by the subpoena are not relevant to the case at hand. Provide arguments supporting your position that the requested materials do not contribute to the resolution of the legal matter. Keywords: irrelevant, not relevant, lack of relevance, unrelated to the case, unnecessary. 3. Availability of the Requested Information Elsewhere: Demonstrate that the documents or information sought by the subpoena can be obtained from other sources, making the subpoena unnecessary. Keywords: available elsewhere, obtainable through alternative means, obtainable through less intrusive methods. 4. Overreach or Abuse of Process: Highlight any potential abuse of the legal process, improper motive, or excessive breadth in the scope of the subpoena. Explain how it exceeds what is reasonable or customary in similar cases. Keywords: abuse of process, improper motive, excessive breadth, overreach, unreasonable scope. Keep in mind that there might be variations or different types of this affidavit based on the type of legal matter or specific circumstances. The specifics of the case and the relevant laws in Maryland should be considered while tailoring the language and arguments in the affidavit to address the unique concerns and requirements of the situation. It is always advisable to consult with an attorney familiar with Maryland law to ensure proper compliance and effectiveness of legal documents.
