Maine Flight After Accusation/Consciousness of Guilt is a legal doctrine that allows a court to infer guilt in the absence of other evidence. The doctrine is based on the presumption that a person accused of a crime may have a tendency to flee the jurisdiction to avoid apprehension and prosecution. This is considered an indication of guilt. The doctrine is recognized in the state of Maine and is known as Maine Flight After Accusation/Consciousness of Guilt. It can be used as evidence in criminal cases and can often be the deciding factor in a conviction. There are two types of Maine Flight After Accusation/Consciousness of Guilt: actual flight and constructive flight. Actual flight is when an accused person leaves the jurisdiction in which the crime was committed in order to avoid apprehension or prosecution. Constructive flight is when an accused person remains in the jurisdiction, but does something that indicates a consciousness of guilt, such as destroying evidence or making false statements. Maine Flight After Accusation/Consciousness of Guilt is a powerful legal tool that can be used by prosecutors to establish guilt in a criminal case. It is important to remember that while this doctrine may be used to establish guilt, it should not be used as the sole basis for a conviction.