Maine Motion for Additional Peremptory Challenges is a legal procedure that allows litigants in Maine state courts to request additional peremptory challenges in a jury selection process. Peremptory challenges are a limited number of dismissals that attorneys can make without providing a reason for excluding a potential juror. In Maine, the standard number of peremptory challenges is determined by law and depends on the type of case and the number of parties involved. However, there are instances when the assigned number of peremptory challenges might not be sufficient for the litigants to ensure an impartial jury is selected. The Maine Motion for Additional Peremptory Challenges provides a solution in such situations. By filing this motion, a party can request the court's permission to receive extra peremptory challenges to adequately assess prospective jurors during the selection process. This motion is commonly used to address circumstances where complex or high-profile cases require an extensive, fair, and impartial jury selection procedure. It's important to note that the granting of additional peremptory challenges is at the court's discretion. The court will consider the arguments presented in the motion, the complexity or sensitivity of the case, and any potential hardships or biases that may arise during the selection process. The court may also consider the potential impact on the efficiency and expeditiousness of the trial. There are no specific types of Maine Motion for Additional Peremptory Challenges. The motion itself is a procedural tool available to any party in a civil or criminal case in Maine state courts. However, the need for such a motion can vary depending on the nature and circumstances of each case. In conclusion, the Maine Motion for Additional Peremptory Challenges is a legal mechanism to address situations where the standard number of peremptory challenges is deemed insufficient. By filing this motion, parties can request extra peremptory challenges to ensure a fair and impartial jury selection, particularly in complex or high-profile cases. However, the court has discretionary power to grant or deny the request based on various factors concerning the case.