A jury instruction is the judge's oral explanation of the law governing a case. Jury instructions are given after the attorneys have presented all the evidence and have made final arguments, but before the jury begins deliberations. Improper explanations of the law to be applied in jury instructions are often the basis for later appeals. Proof of demand and refusal is not essential to the maintenance of an action for conversion when the conversion is otherwise established.
Michigan Instruction to Jury as to When Demand is not Necessary in Constituting Conversion In Michigan, the Instruction to Jury as to When Demand is not Necessary in Constituting Conversion is designed to provide guidance to the jury in cases involving conversion, specifically when a demand for the return of the property is not necessary for a claim of conversion to be valid. This instruction highlights the circumstances under which a demand is not required, ensuring a fair and just trial process. Keywords: Michigan, instruction, jury, demand, necessary, constituting, conversion Types of Michigan Instructions to Jury as to When Demand is not Necessary in Constituting Conversion: 1. Instruction regarding immediate possession: This type of instruction informs the jury that if a defendant unlawfully takes someone's property without their consent, a demand for its return is not necessary to establish a claim of conversion. Emphasizing the immediacy of the act, this instruction asserts that the plaintiff is not required to make a demand before seeking legal recourse. 2. Instruction for known refusal to return: This instruction pertains to situations where the defendant has previously been made aware of the plaintiff's interest in the property, but still refuses to return it. The jury is instructed that when the defendant is already aware of the demand and fails to comply, a subsequent demand is not necessary for a conversion claim. 3. Instruction regarding the impossibility of demand: This type of instruction is relevant when the circumstances make it impossible or futile for the plaintiff to make a demand for the return of the property. For example, if the defendant intentionally conceals or hides the property or is otherwise unapproachable, the jury is instructed that a demand is unnecessary. 4. Instruction for denial of ownership: This instruction is employed when the defendant denies the plaintiff's ownership of the property. It clarifies that when the defendant openly disputes the plaintiff's right to possess the property, a demand is not required to establish a claim of conversion. 5. Instruction for wrongful acquisition: In cases where the defendant obtains possession of the property through wrongful means, such as theft or fraud, this instruction relays that a demand is not necessary to substantiate a conversion claim. It emphasizes that the plaintiff's lack of consent serves as sufficient grounds for not requiring a demand. These various types of Michigan Instructions to Jury as to When Demand is not Necessary in Constituting Conversion ensure that the jury comprehends the specific circumstances under which a demand is not needed for a successful claim of conversion. The instructions aid in delivering a fair and accurate verdict while upholding the principles of justice and the law in Michigan.Michigan Instruction to Jury as to When Demand is not Necessary in Constituting Conversion In Michigan, the Instruction to Jury as to When Demand is not Necessary in Constituting Conversion is designed to provide guidance to the jury in cases involving conversion, specifically when a demand for the return of the property is not necessary for a claim of conversion to be valid. This instruction highlights the circumstances under which a demand is not required, ensuring a fair and just trial process. Keywords: Michigan, instruction, jury, demand, necessary, constituting, conversion Types of Michigan Instructions to Jury as to When Demand is not Necessary in Constituting Conversion: 1. Instruction regarding immediate possession: This type of instruction informs the jury that if a defendant unlawfully takes someone's property without their consent, a demand for its return is not necessary to establish a claim of conversion. Emphasizing the immediacy of the act, this instruction asserts that the plaintiff is not required to make a demand before seeking legal recourse. 2. Instruction for known refusal to return: This instruction pertains to situations where the defendant has previously been made aware of the plaintiff's interest in the property, but still refuses to return it. The jury is instructed that when the defendant is already aware of the demand and fails to comply, a subsequent demand is not necessary for a conversion claim. 3. Instruction regarding the impossibility of demand: This type of instruction is relevant when the circumstances make it impossible or futile for the plaintiff to make a demand for the return of the property. For example, if the defendant intentionally conceals or hides the property or is otherwise unapproachable, the jury is instructed that a demand is unnecessary. 4. Instruction for denial of ownership: This instruction is employed when the defendant denies the plaintiff's ownership of the property. It clarifies that when the defendant openly disputes the plaintiff's right to possess the property, a demand is not required to establish a claim of conversion. 5. Instruction for wrongful acquisition: In cases where the defendant obtains possession of the property through wrongful means, such as theft or fraud, this instruction relays that a demand is not necessary to substantiate a conversion claim. It emphasizes that the plaintiff's lack of consent serves as sufficient grounds for not requiring a demand. These various types of Michigan Instructions to Jury as to When Demand is not Necessary in Constituting Conversion ensure that the jury comprehends the specific circumstances under which a demand is not needed for a successful claim of conversion. The instructions aid in delivering a fair and accurate verdict while upholding the principles of justice and the law in Michigan.