Minnesota Sample Letter Notifying City of Counsel's Refusal to Submit Proposal to Serve as Bond Counsel

• Category: Letters - Legal - Bond Issue
• State: Multi-State
• Control #: US-0440LTR
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form is a sample letter in Word format covering the subject matter of the title of the form. Dear [City Council], I am writing to inform you of my decision to decline the opportunity to submit a proposal to serve as bond counsel for the City of [City Name]. After careful consideration, I have determined that it is not feasible for me to take on this responsibility at this time. I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, and I appreciate your understanding. As a reputable attorney with extensive experience in municipal finance and bond issuance, I understand the significance and complexity of bond counsel services. However, due to my current workload and commitments, I regrettably cannot dedicate the time and resources necessary to fulfill the role of bond counsel effectively. I firmly believe that selecting a bond counsel is a critical decision for the municipality, and it is crucial to choose an attorney who can commit their full attention and expertise to the task. Given my current professional obligations, I feel it is in the best interest of both parties that I decline to submit a proposal. I would like to express my gratitude for considering me as a potential candidate for this role. It is an honor to be acknowledged for my expertise in municipal bond financing. If circumstances change in the future, I would be more than willing to discuss the possibility of collaborating on another project or providing assistance in a different capacity. In the meantime, I am available to address any questions or concerns you may have regarding my decision. Once again, I apologize for any inconvenience and wish you the best in securing capable bond counsel for the City of [City Name]. Thank you for your time and understanding. Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Law Firm] [Your Contact Information] Alternative types of Minnesota Sample Letter Notifying City of Counsel's Refusal to Submit Proposal to Serve as Bond Counsel: 1. Direct and Concise Refusal: This type of letter would provide a straightforward and succinct statement declining the opportunity to submit a proposal, without going into extensive detail. It may be suitable for situations where the attorney wishes to convey their decision quickly and without lengthy explanations. 2. Comprehensive Explanation with Alternatives: This type of letter would not only decline the proposal but also provide alternative suggestions or recommendations for other bond counsel candidates. This approach aims to assist the city in finding a suitable replacement while still highlighting the attorney's expertise and willingness to be of assistance. 3. Conditional Refusal with Future Consideration: In this type of letter, the attorney may express their inability to submit a proposal at the present time but leaves the door open for future opportunities. They may indicate their interest to revisit the proposal under different circumstances or when their availability changes. This approach maintains a positive relationship with the city and leaves room for potential collaborations in the future.

Dear [City Council], I am writing to inform you of my decision to decline the opportunity to submit a proposal to serve as bond counsel for the City of [City Name]. After careful consideration, I have determined that it is not feasible for me to take on this responsibility at this time. I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, and I appreciate your understanding. As a reputable attorney with extensive experience in municipal finance and bond issuance, I understand the significance and complexity of bond counsel services. However, due to my current workload and commitments, I regrettably cannot dedicate the time and resources necessary to fulfill the role of bond counsel effectively. I firmly believe that selecting a bond counsel is a critical decision for the municipality, and it is crucial to choose an attorney who can commit their full attention and expertise to the task. Given my current professional obligations, I feel it is in the best interest of both parties that I decline to submit a proposal. I would like to express my gratitude for considering me as a potential candidate for this role. It is an honor to be acknowledged for my expertise in municipal bond financing. If circumstances change in the future, I would be more than willing to discuss the possibility of collaborating on another project or providing assistance in a different capacity. In the meantime, I am available to address any questions or concerns you may have regarding my decision. Once again, I apologize for any inconvenience and wish you the best in securing capable bond counsel for the City of [City Name]. Thank you for your time and understanding. Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Law Firm] [Your Contact Information] Alternative types of Minnesota Sample Letter Notifying City of Counsel's Refusal to Submit Proposal to Serve as Bond Counsel: 1. Direct and Concise Refusal: This type of letter would provide a straightforward and succinct statement declining the opportunity to submit a proposal, without going into extensive detail. It may be suitable for situations where the attorney wishes to convey their decision quickly and without lengthy explanations. 2. Comprehensive Explanation with Alternatives: This type of letter would not only decline the proposal but also provide alternative suggestions or recommendations for other bond counsel candidates. This approach aims to assist the city in finding a suitable replacement while still highlighting the attorney's expertise and willingness to be of assistance. 3. Conditional Refusal with Future Consideration: In this type of letter, the attorney may express their inability to submit a proposal at the present time but leaves the door open for future opportunities. They may indicate their interest to revisit the proposal under different circumstances or when their availability changes. This approach maintains a positive relationship with the city and leaves room for potential collaborations in the future.