Minnesota Jury Instruction — 3 Credibility Of Witnesses is a legal instruction provided to jury members in the state of Minnesota regarding the evaluation of witness credibility during trial proceedings. Witness credibility plays a crucial role in determining the weight and reliability of their testimony, ultimately influencing the outcome of a case. The instruction covers several essential aspects that jury members should consider when assessing the credibility of witnesses. These important keywords highlight the core elements involved: 1. Witness credibility: The instruction emphasizes the significance of assessing the credibility of witnesses, as their testimony is a key factor in determining the truthfulness and accuracy of events presented in court. 2. Competence and demeanor: Jurors are advised to carefully observe the competence and demeanor of each witness while testifying. Factors such as clarity of communication, confidence, consistency, body language, and demeanor can provide indications of a witness's credibility. 3. Bias or prejudice: It is crucial for jurors to identify any potential bias or prejudice that a witness may harbor, which could potentially affect their credibility. The instruction directs jurors to consider the relationship between the witness and the parties involved, any personal motives, or interests that could sway their testimony. 4. Prior inconsistent statements: If a witness has made contradictory statements or changed their testimony, jurors are instructed to evaluate the impact of these inconsistencies on their credibility. This aspect ensures that the jury is aware of potential discrepancies or inconsistencies in the witness's account. 5. Interest in the outcome: The instruction prompts jurors to assess whether a witness's personal stake or vested interest in the case could potentially impact their credibility. This includes considering if the witness stands to benefit financially, gain revenge, protect someone, or has any other motives that could potentially undermine their objectivity. 6. Corroborating or conflicting evidence: The instruction empowers jurors to evaluate the consistency of witness testimony with other evidence presented during the trial. If a witness's account is supported by other credible evidence or contradicted by conflicting evidence, it can significantly impact their credibility. 7. Expert witnesses: In cases where expert witnesses testify, special attention is given to their qualifications, experience, and the reliability of their methodology or scientific basis. Jurors are instructed to assess the credibility of expert witnesses based on their expertise, reputation, and adherence to scientific standards. Certain types or variations of Minnesota Jury Instruction — 3 Credibility Of Witnesses may exist based on specific legal contexts or case types. Examples may include instructions regarding the assessment of child witnesses, eyewitness identification, credibility during civil cases, or credibility assessment in cases involving sexual assault. However, the specific variations or additional instructions given to the jury would depend on the particular circumstances of the trial.