Minnesota Jury Instruction — 1.2.1 Race And Or Sex Discrimination Discharge — Failure To PromotIncludingin— - Same Decision Defense: Overview: Minnesota Jury Instruction 1.2.1 addresses cases involving race and/or sex discrimination in the form of discharge or failure to promote by an employer. It specifically focuses on situations where an employee claims they were treated unfavorably based on their race or sex, resulting in not being promoted or being discharged. The instruction mentions the "Same Decision Defense," which is used by employers to argue that the decision to discharge or not promote the employee was based on legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons. Keywords: — Minnesota JurInstructionio— - Race discrimination — Sex discriminatio— - Discharge - Failure to promote — Same decisiodefensens— - Employee rights — Workplace discriminatio— - Employment law — Employer defense Types of Minnesota Jury Instruction — 1.2.1 Race And Or Sex Discrimination Discharge — Failure To PromotIncludingin— - Same Decision Defense: 1. Discharge Due to Race Discrimination: This variant of the jury instruction addresses cases where an employee claims they were fired based on their race. It instructs the jury on how to evaluate the evidence, consider the employee's claims, and assess whether discriminatory motives were at play in their discharge. 2. Discharge Due to Sex Discrimination: Similar to the previous type, this instruction applies specifically to discharge cases where an employee alleges their termination was solely because of their sex. It emphasizes the need for the jury to consider the evidence and determine if discrimination based on sex played a role in the decision to terminate the employee. 3. Failure to Promote Due to Race Discrimination: This form of the instruction focuses on situations where an employee claims they were denied a promotion due to their race. It guides the jury on how to examine the evidence, determine if discriminatory actions occurred, and assess whether race played a significant role in the employer's decision not to promote. 4. Failure to Promote Due to Sex Discrimination: Similar to the above instruction, this variant concentrates on cases where an employee alleges they were denied a promotion based on their sex. It provides guidance to the jury on assessing the evidence and deciding if sex discrimination was a significant factor contributing to the employer's decision not to promote the employee. 5. Same Decision Defense: This element is common to all the variants mentioned above and explains the "Same Decision Defense" strategy that employers can employ to argue against allegations of discrimination. It advises the jury to consider whether the employer had legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for the discharge or failure to promote, even if the employee believes discrimination was involved. In conclusion, Minnesota Jury Instruction — 1.2.1 Race And Or Sex Discrimination Discharge — Failure To PromotIncludingin— - Same Decision Defense is a comprehensive set of instructions used to guide juries in cases involving race and/or sex-based discrimination in discharges or failure to promote. Different instruction variants address specific scenarios depending on the nature of the discrimination claimed.