Keywords: Minnesota, jury instruction, convicted prisoner, deliberate indifference, serious medical need The Minnesota Jury Instruction — 2.2.3.2 Convicted Prisoner Alleging Deliberate Indifference To Serious Medical Need provides guidelines for jurors when evaluating cases involving convicted prisoners who allege deliberate indifference to their serious medical needs. This instruction ensures that jurors have a clear understanding of the legal standards and principles that apply to such cases, enabling them to make fair and informed decisions. Deliberate indifference refers to the intentional disregard or lack of concern by prison officials or medical personnel towards an inmate's serious medical condition. This instruction recognizes that individuals in custody have a constitutional right to adequate medical care, and it sets the criteria for determining if deliberate indifference exists in a given case. The instruction might outline different elements that must be proven by the prisoner in order to establish deliberate indifference. For instance, the prisoner may need to demonstrate that they had a serious medical need, which can include conditions like severe illnesses, injuries, or chronic conditions that require professional medical attention. The instruction could also require proof that the defendant, typically a prison official or healthcare provider, was aware of the inmate's medical condition and displayed deliberate indifference towards providing necessary care. Additionally, the Minnesota Jury Instruction might provide further explanations regarding the standard of care expected in prison settings, acknowledging inherent limitations on medical resources. It may clarify that deliberate indifference does not require perfect medical treatment, but rather a showing that the defendant's actions or inaction were substantially below the accepted standards of care and posed a significant risk to the prisoner's health. Furthermore, there may be variations or other related jury instructions in Minnesota's legal framework depending on the specific circumstances. For example, there could be separate instructions for cases involving different levels of medical need, such as emergencies that require immediate attention versus chronic conditions that necessitate ongoing care. Each of these instructions would provide specific guidance to the jury on how to evaluate the evidence and determine liability in accordance with the law. In summary, the Minnesota Jury Instruction — 2.2.3.2 Convicted Prisoner Alleging Deliberate Indifference To Serious Medical Need plays a vital role in helping jurors properly assess cases involving convicted prisoners who claim deliberate indifference to their serious medical needs. By adhering to this instruction, jurors can ensure that justice is served and that the constitutional rights of prisoners to adequate medical care are protected.