Minnesota Jury Instruction - 9.9.1 General Instruction - Including Partial Taking Instructions

• Category: Federal - Jury Instructions
• State: Multi-State
• Control #: US-11CF-9-9-1
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs. Minnesota Jury Instruction — 9.9.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Including Partial Taking Instructions In Minnesota, during legal proceedings that involve eminent domain or other similar cases, the courts provide instruction to the jury regarding the general principles and legal considerations applicable to the case. One such instruction is Minnesota Jury Instruction 9.9.1, which specifically addresses the matter of partial taking in eminent domain cases. 1. Partial Taking Instructions: Minnesota Jury Instruction 9.9.1 covers various aspects related to partial taking in eminent domain cases. It provides guidance to the jury on how to evaluate the value of the property taken and the damages caused to the remaining property. The instruction lays out the following key elements: A. Value of Property Taken: This instruction clarifies that the jury shall determine the value of the portion or property taken by considering factors such as fair market value, replacement cost, and any other relevant evidence presented during the trial. B. Damages to Remaining Property: The instruction specifies that the jury should also evaluate the damages caused to the remaining property as a result of the partial taking. These damages may include loss of access, loss of visibility, or any other negative impact on the property's functionality or value. C. Compensation: The instruction emphasizes that the property owner is entitled to just compensation for both the value of the property taken and the damages caused to the remaining property. The jury should calculate the total compensation accordingly. D. Evidentiary Considerations: Minnesota Jury Instruction 9.9.1 also guides the jury on evaluating the evidence presented by both parties regarding property value and damages. The jury should weigh the credibility, relevance, and weight of each piece of evidence to reach a fair and just conclusion. E. Jury Deliberation: The instruction encompasses how the jury should carefully deliberate, assess the evidence, and come to a unanimous decision regarding the value of the property taken and the damages to the remaining property. In summary, Minnesota Jury Instruction — 9.9.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Including Partial Taking Instructions provides comprehensive guidelines to the jury for determining the value of a property or its partial taking. It ensures that the jury understands the importance of considering all relevant factors and reaching a fair and just compensation for both the property taken and the damages to the remaining property in eminent domain cases.

Minnesota Jury Instruction — 9.9.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Including Partial Taking Instructions In Minnesota, during legal proceedings that involve eminent domain or other similar cases, the courts provide instruction to the jury regarding the general principles and legal considerations applicable to the case. One such instruction is Minnesota Jury Instruction 9.9.1, which specifically addresses the matter of partial taking in eminent domain cases. 1. Partial Taking Instructions: Minnesota Jury Instruction 9.9.1 covers various aspects related to partial taking in eminent domain cases. It provides guidance to the jury on how to evaluate the value of the property taken and the damages caused to the remaining property. The instruction lays out the following key elements: A. Value of Property Taken: This instruction clarifies that the jury shall determine the value of the portion or property taken by considering factors such as fair market value, replacement cost, and any other relevant evidence presented during the trial. B. Damages to Remaining Property: The instruction specifies that the jury should also evaluate the damages caused to the remaining property as a result of the partial taking. These damages may include loss of access, loss of visibility, or any other negative impact on the property's functionality or value. C. Compensation: The instruction emphasizes that the property owner is entitled to just compensation for both the value of the property taken and the damages caused to the remaining property. The jury should calculate the total compensation accordingly. D. Evidentiary Considerations: Minnesota Jury Instruction 9.9.1 also guides the jury on evaluating the evidence presented by both parties regarding property value and damages. The jury should weigh the credibility, relevance, and weight of each piece of evidence to reach a fair and just conclusion. E. Jury Deliberation: The instruction encompasses how the jury should carefully deliberate, assess the evidence, and come to a unanimous decision regarding the value of the property taken and the damages to the remaining property. In summary, Minnesota Jury Instruction — 9.9.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Including Partial Taking Instructions provides comprehensive guidelines to the jury for determining the value of a property or its partial taking. It ensures that the jury understands the importance of considering all relevant factors and reaching a fair and just compensation for both the property taken and the damages to the remaining property in eminent domain cases.