In Missouri, there are a variety of reasons why a judge might not permit video recording in a courtroom. These reasons may include protecting the privacy of all parties involved, preserving the integrity of the proceedings, and maintaining the decorum of the court. Privacy Concerns: Privacy is of the utmost importance in any legal proceeding. Video recording in the courtroom may violate the privacy of the parties involved, including the accused, witnesses, lawyers, and the judge. The recording could also be used to intimidate or harass any of the parties involved, or to spread false information about them. Preserving Integrity: Video recording could also interfere with the integrity of the court proceedings. For example, the recording could be edited or used to manipulate witnesses or evidence in a way that could be damaging to the court's decision. Video recordings could also be used to spread false information about the trial and its participants. Maintaining Decorum: Video recording in the courtroom could also disrupt the decorum of the court. For example, spectators may become more vocal or disruptive if they know they are being recorded. This can lead to a loss of focus on the trial proceedings and could potentially interfere with the court's decision. Overall, Missouri judges can choose to not permit video recording in the courtroom for any combination of the aforementioned reasons. It is important to respect the judge's decision in order to maintain the privacy, integrity, and decorum of the court.