Missouri Motion in Limine to Prevent Reference to Seat Belt Use

• Category: Civil Procedure - Motions - Sample Motions
• State: Multi-State
• Control #: US-MOT-01416
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form is a model Motion In Limine to Prevent Reference to Seat Belt Use. It may be possible to exclude testimony on seatbelt use or lack thereof in an auto accident case. This motion allows the judge to rule on the issue prior to the jury being present. Missouri Motion in Liming to Prevent Reference to Seat Belt Use is a legal strategy employed in personal injury cases to preclude any mention or evidence related to the use or non-use of seat belts by the involved parties. This motion seeks to exclude any arguments, statements, or testimony pertaining to seat belt usage as it may potentially bias or mislead the jury, affecting their judgment regarding liability and damages. In Missouri, there are several types of Motions in Liming that can be filed specifically targeting seat belt use: 1. General Motion in Liming: This motion seeks a broad prohibition on the mention or introduction of seat belt use evidence during the trial. It aims to prevent any allusions to seat belt non-use as a contributory factor or negligence on the part of the injured party. 2. Expert Witness Testimony Exclusion Motion: This motion seeks to exclude any expert witnesses from testifying or offering opinions regarding the significance of seat belt use in the context of the case. It challenges claims that seat belt non-use directly caused or aggravated the injuries sustained. 3. Police Report Exclusion Motion: This motion targets the exclusion of any seat belt-related information from police reports presented as evidence. It argues that such references are irrelevant and could unfairly influence the jury's perception of liability. 4. Witness Testimony Limitation Motion: This motion seeks to restrict witnesses from discussing seat belt use during their testimonies. It asserts that introducing this information would create an improper focus on comparative negligence and distract from the central issues of the case. 5. Opening and Closing Statement Restriction Motion: This motion aims to prevent attorneys from referring to seat belt use during their opening and closing statements. It asserts that such references are prejudicial and could unduly influence the jury's decision-making process. It is important to note that the specific types of Motions in Liming may vary depending on the case and the legal strategy employed by the attorneys. These motions are intended to ensure a fair and unbiased trial by eliminating potentially irrelevant or prejudicial information related to seat belt use.

Missouri Motion in Liming to Prevent Reference to Seat Belt Use is a legal strategy employed in personal injury cases to preclude any mention or evidence related to the use or non-use of seat belts by the involved parties. This motion seeks to exclude any arguments, statements, or testimony pertaining to seat belt usage as it may potentially bias or mislead the jury, affecting their judgment regarding liability and damages. In Missouri, there are several types of Motions in Liming that can be filed specifically targeting seat belt use: 1. General Motion in Liming: This motion seeks a broad prohibition on the mention or introduction of seat belt use evidence during the trial. It aims to prevent any allusions to seat belt non-use as a contributory factor or negligence on the part of the injured party. 2. Expert Witness Testimony Exclusion Motion: This motion seeks to exclude any expert witnesses from testifying or offering opinions regarding the significance of seat belt use in the context of the case. It challenges claims that seat belt non-use directly caused or aggravated the injuries sustained. 3. Police Report Exclusion Motion: This motion targets the exclusion of any seat belt-related information from police reports presented as evidence. It argues that such references are irrelevant and could unfairly influence the jury's perception of liability. 4. Witness Testimony Limitation Motion: This motion seeks to restrict witnesses from discussing seat belt use during their testimonies. It asserts that introducing this information would create an improper focus on comparative negligence and distract from the central issues of the case. 5. Opening and Closing Statement Restriction Motion: This motion aims to prevent attorneys from referring to seat belt use during their opening and closing statements. It asserts that such references are prejudicial and could unduly influence the jury's decision-making process. It is important to note that the specific types of Motions in Liming may vary depending on the case and the legal strategy employed by the attorneys. These motions are intended to ensure a fair and unbiased trial by eliminating potentially irrelevant or prejudicial information related to seat belt use.