This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs.
Mississippi Jury Instruction — 7.7.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense is a set of instructions given to a jury in a civil case to explain the concept of comparative negligence and its application in determining liability and damages. In Mississippi, comparative negligence is a legal doctrine followed in personal injury cases to allocate the fault between the parties involved based on their respective degrees of negligence. The purpose of this instruction is to guide the jury in understanding and applying comparative negligence principles when assessing liability and damages. Keywords: Mississippi Jury Instruction, 7.7.1, General Instruction, Comparative Negligence Defense, civil case, concept, liability, damages, personal injury cases, fault, negligence, allocation, guides, understanding, principles, assessing. Different Types of Mississippi Jury Instruction — 7.7.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense: 1. Pure Comparative Negligence: Under this type of instruction, the jury is instructed to assign a percentage of negligence to each party involved in the case, including the plaintiff. The total amount of damages awarded will then be reduced by the percentage of negligence attributed to the plaintiff. 2. Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar Rule: This instruction instructs the jury that the plaintiff can only recover damages if their negligence is less than or equal to the combined negligence of the other parties involved. If the plaintiff's negligence is found to be greater than 50%, they are barred from recovering any damages. 3. Modified Comparative Negligence — 51% Bar Rule: Similar to the 50% Bar Rule, this instruction states that the plaintiff can only recover damages if their negligence is less than or equal to the combined negligence of the other parties. However, in this case, the plaintiff can recover damages even if their negligence is 51% or less. It is important for the jury to carefully consider the evidence presented and apply the appropriate type of instruction to ensure a fair and just outcome in the case. Keywords: Pure Comparative Negligence, Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar Rule, Modified Comparative Negligence — 51% Bar Rule, jury, percentage, negligence, damages, plaintiff, recover, evidence, fair, just outcome, case.
Mississippi Jury Instruction — 7.7.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense is a set of instructions given to a jury in a civil case to explain the concept of comparative negligence and its application in determining liability and damages. In Mississippi, comparative negligence is a legal doctrine followed in personal injury cases to allocate the fault between the parties involved based on their respective degrees of negligence. The purpose of this instruction is to guide the jury in understanding and applying comparative negligence principles when assessing liability and damages. Keywords: Mississippi Jury Instruction, 7.7.1, General Instruction, Comparative Negligence Defense, civil case, concept, liability, damages, personal injury cases, fault, negligence, allocation, guides, understanding, principles, assessing. Different Types of Mississippi Jury Instruction — 7.7.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense: 1. Pure Comparative Negligence: Under this type of instruction, the jury is instructed to assign a percentage of negligence to each party involved in the case, including the plaintiff. The total amount of damages awarded will then be reduced by the percentage of negligence attributed to the plaintiff. 2. Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar Rule: This instruction instructs the jury that the plaintiff can only recover damages if their negligence is less than or equal to the combined negligence of the other parties involved. If the plaintiff's negligence is found to be greater than 50%, they are barred from recovering any damages. 3. Modified Comparative Negligence — 51% Bar Rule: Similar to the 50% Bar Rule, this instruction states that the plaintiff can only recover damages if their negligence is less than or equal to the combined negligence of the other parties. However, in this case, the plaintiff can recover damages even if their negligence is 51% or less. It is important for the jury to carefully consider the evidence presented and apply the appropriate type of instruction to ensure a fair and just outcome in the case. Keywords: Pure Comparative Negligence, Modified Comparative Negligence — 50% Bar Rule, Modified Comparative Negligence — 51% Bar Rule, jury, percentage, negligence, damages, plaintiff, recover, evidence, fair, just outcome, case.