A motion to quash asks the judge for an order setting aside or nullifying an action, such as "quashing" service of a summons.
This form is a generic example that may be referred to when preparing such a form for your particular state. It is for illustrative purposes only. Local laws should be consulted to determine any specific requirements for such a form in a particular jurisdiction.
In North Carolina, an Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive is a legal document filed by an individual or entity who believes that a subpoena duces tecum (a subpoena requiring the production of documents or tangible items) is unjustified and oppressive. This affidavit is used to request the court to quash or set aside the subpoena. Keywords: North Carolina, affidavit, support, motion, quash, subpoena, duces tecum, unreasonable, oppressive, legal document, court, request. There are several types of North Carolina Affidavits in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive, including: 1. Individual Affidavit: This affidavit is filed by an individual who has been served with a subpoena duces tecum and believes it to be unreasonable and oppressive. The affidavit will provide detailed reasons and supporting evidence to substantiate the claim. 2. Corporate Affidavit: Filed by a corporation or business entity that has received a subpoena duces tecum, this affidavit will outline the reasons why the subpoena is deemed unreasonable and oppressive, taking into account the burden it places on the company, the relevance of the requested documents, and any potential invasion of privacy. 3. Expert Witness Affidavit: In some cases, an expert witness may be required to provide their opinion regarding the unreasonableness and oppressiveness of a subpoena duces tecum. This type of affidavit will present the expert's qualifications and credibility, as well as a professional analysis of the subpoena's implications. 4. Joint Affidavit: If multiple parties are served with the same subpoena duces tecum and wish to challenge its validity together, they can file a joint affidavit. This type of affidavit will combine the arguments and supporting evidence from each party, jointly presenting their case against the subpoena. 5. Confidentiality Affidavit: When a subpoena duces tecum implicates confidential or sensitive information, a confidentiality affidavit may be included. This affidavit seeks to protect the privacy and confidentiality of the documents or items being requested, emphasizing the need to quash the subpoena to prevent the violation of these rights. It is important to consult with an attorney who specializes in North Carolina legal matters to determine the specific type of affidavit required and to accurately draft and file the document in accordance with the state's laws and regulations.In North Carolina, an Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive is a legal document filed by an individual or entity who believes that a subpoena duces tecum (a subpoena requiring the production of documents or tangible items) is unjustified and oppressive. This affidavit is used to request the court to quash or set aside the subpoena. Keywords: North Carolina, affidavit, support, motion, quash, subpoena, duces tecum, unreasonable, oppressive, legal document, court, request. There are several types of North Carolina Affidavits in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive, including: 1. Individual Affidavit: This affidavit is filed by an individual who has been served with a subpoena duces tecum and believes it to be unreasonable and oppressive. The affidavit will provide detailed reasons and supporting evidence to substantiate the claim. 2. Corporate Affidavit: Filed by a corporation or business entity that has received a subpoena duces tecum, this affidavit will outline the reasons why the subpoena is deemed unreasonable and oppressive, taking into account the burden it places on the company, the relevance of the requested documents, and any potential invasion of privacy. 3. Expert Witness Affidavit: In some cases, an expert witness may be required to provide their opinion regarding the unreasonableness and oppressiveness of a subpoena duces tecum. This type of affidavit will present the expert's qualifications and credibility, as well as a professional analysis of the subpoena's implications. 4. Joint Affidavit: If multiple parties are served with the same subpoena duces tecum and wish to challenge its validity together, they can file a joint affidavit. This type of affidavit will combine the arguments and supporting evidence from each party, jointly presenting their case against the subpoena. 5. Confidentiality Affidavit: When a subpoena duces tecum implicates confidential or sensitive information, a confidentiality affidavit may be included. This affidavit seeks to protect the privacy and confidentiality of the documents or items being requested, emphasizing the need to quash the subpoena to prevent the violation of these rights. It is important to consult with an attorney who specializes in North Carolina legal matters to determine the specific type of affidavit required and to accurately draft and file the document in accordance with the state's laws and regulations.
