This is simply a short statement that states that, in the event of a conflict between the provisions of one Article and the terms and conditions contained in prior Articles provided for in the Agreement, the parties agree that the provisions of a designated Article shall prevail.
North Carolina Conflict of Terms is a legal concept that refers to the conflict or contradiction that may arise between different provisions or terms within a legal document in the state of North Carolina. It is essential to understand the various aspects and types of conflicts that can occur in order to effectively navigate through legal matters in the state. In legal terms, conflict of terms can encompass different scenarios such as conflicts within contracts, statutes, wills, regulations, or any other legal instrument. These conflicts may occur due to ambiguity, inconsistency, or contradiction between different provisions or terms mentioned within the document. There are several types of North Carolina Conflict of Terms that individuals or legal professionals should be aware of, including: 1. Internal Conflict: This refers to conflicts that arise within a single legal instrument, such as a contract or a will. It occurs when two or more provisions within the same document contradict or are inconsistent with each other. 2. External Conflict: External conflicts occur when different legal documents, such as two contracts or statutes, are in contradiction or inconsistent with each other. Resolving external conflicts of terms can be complex, as it involves identifying which document should prevail and how to interpret conflicting provisions. 3. Conflict of Laws: This type of conflict arises when laws or legal principles from different jurisdictions, such as federal and state law or laws from different states, conflict with each other. Resolving conflicts of laws involves determining which jurisdiction's law should prevail in a particular situation. 4. Conflict with Public Policy: This occurs when a provision or term within a legal document contradicts public policy principles. In such cases, the conflicting provision may be deemed unenforceable or void. 5. Conflict between Express and Implied Terms: Express terms are those specifically mentioned within a legal document, while implied terms are understood or implied by law. Conflicts between these two types of terms can arise and must be addressed to determine their relative precedence. Given the complexity and potential implications of conflicts of terms, it is crucial to seek legal advice or consult an attorney when encountering such situations in North Carolina. Experienced legal professionals can assess the nature of the conflict, identify relevant principles, and help determine the appropriate course of action to resolve conflicts effectively in accordance with North Carolina law.North Carolina Conflict of Terms is a legal concept that refers to the conflict or contradiction that may arise between different provisions or terms within a legal document in the state of North Carolina. It is essential to understand the various aspects and types of conflicts that can occur in order to effectively navigate through legal matters in the state. In legal terms, conflict of terms can encompass different scenarios such as conflicts within contracts, statutes, wills, regulations, or any other legal instrument. These conflicts may occur due to ambiguity, inconsistency, or contradiction between different provisions or terms mentioned within the document. There are several types of North Carolina Conflict of Terms that individuals or legal professionals should be aware of, including: 1. Internal Conflict: This refers to conflicts that arise within a single legal instrument, such as a contract or a will. It occurs when two or more provisions within the same document contradict or are inconsistent with each other. 2. External Conflict: External conflicts occur when different legal documents, such as two contracts or statutes, are in contradiction or inconsistent with each other. Resolving external conflicts of terms can be complex, as it involves identifying which document should prevail and how to interpret conflicting provisions. 3. Conflict of Laws: This type of conflict arises when laws or legal principles from different jurisdictions, such as federal and state law or laws from different states, conflict with each other. Resolving conflicts of laws involves determining which jurisdiction's law should prevail in a particular situation. 4. Conflict with Public Policy: This occurs when a provision or term within a legal document contradicts public policy principles. In such cases, the conflicting provision may be deemed unenforceable or void. 5. Conflict between Express and Implied Terms: Express terms are those specifically mentioned within a legal document, while implied terms are understood or implied by law. Conflicts between these two types of terms can arise and must be addressed to determine their relative precedence. Given the complexity and potential implications of conflicts of terms, it is crucial to seek legal advice or consult an attorney when encountering such situations in North Carolina. Experienced legal professionals can assess the nature of the conflict, identify relevant principles, and help determine the appropriate course of action to resolve conflicts effectively in accordance with North Carolina law.
