This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs.
North Dakota Jury Instruction — 1.1 Duty To Mitigate In General: Keywords: North Dakota, jury instruction, duty to mitigate, general, types Introduction: North Dakota Jury Instruction — 1.1 Duty to Mitigate In General refers to a legal instruction given to the jury in a civil case in the state of North Dakota. This instruction highlights a party's obligation to minimize or mitigate the damages they have suffered due to a defendant's actions. By employing reasonable efforts, the injured party must take steps to reduce their losses and avoid unnecessary damages. Failure to fulfill this duty may affect the amount of compensation they can recover. Types of North Dakota Jury Instruction — 1.1 Duty to Mitigate In General: 1. Ordinary Negligence Cases: This type of jury instruction is applicable in cases involving ordinary negligence, meaning a failure to act reasonably in certain circumstances. It reminds the jury that the plaintiff has the duty to make reasonable efforts to minimize their damages, even if the defendant's negligence caused the initial harm. 2. Personal Injury Cases: When dealing with personal injury claims, the duty to mitigate instruction is crucial. It informs the jury about the plaintiff's responsibility to seek appropriate medical treatment, follow prescribed therapy, and take other reasonable actions to prevent further harm or expedite their recovery. If the injured person fails to mitigate their damages, the jury may reduce the compensation accordingly. 3. Employment Law Cases: In certain employment disputes, such as wrongful termination or discrimination cases, this instruction applies. It clarifies that employees have a duty to mitigate damages by actively searching for new employment opportunities. If an employee fails to make reasonable efforts to find a comparable job, they might not be entitled to receive full compensation for the income they lost due to the wrongful termination. 4. Breach of Contract Cases: This variety of the jury instruction is applicable to breach of contract claims. It notifies the jury that when a party breaches a contract, the non-breaching party must minimize the damages by taking reasonable steps to reduce their losses. This can involve finding an alternative supplier, seeking substitute goods, and avoiding unnecessary expenses. Conclusion: North Dakota Jury Instruction — 1.1 Duty to Mitigate In General emphasizes the duty of a plaintiff to minimize the damages caused by a defendant's actions. It instructs the jury to consider whether the injured party made reasonable efforts to mitigate their losses. The types of cases in which this instruction is relevant include ordinary negligence, personal injury, employment law, and breach of contract.
North Dakota Jury Instruction — 1.1 Duty To Mitigate In General: Keywords: North Dakota, jury instruction, duty to mitigate, general, types Introduction: North Dakota Jury Instruction — 1.1 Duty to Mitigate In General refers to a legal instruction given to the jury in a civil case in the state of North Dakota. This instruction highlights a party's obligation to minimize or mitigate the damages they have suffered due to a defendant's actions. By employing reasonable efforts, the injured party must take steps to reduce their losses and avoid unnecessary damages. Failure to fulfill this duty may affect the amount of compensation they can recover. Types of North Dakota Jury Instruction — 1.1 Duty to Mitigate In General: 1. Ordinary Negligence Cases: This type of jury instruction is applicable in cases involving ordinary negligence, meaning a failure to act reasonably in certain circumstances. It reminds the jury that the plaintiff has the duty to make reasonable efforts to minimize their damages, even if the defendant's negligence caused the initial harm. 2. Personal Injury Cases: When dealing with personal injury claims, the duty to mitigate instruction is crucial. It informs the jury about the plaintiff's responsibility to seek appropriate medical treatment, follow prescribed therapy, and take other reasonable actions to prevent further harm or expedite their recovery. If the injured person fails to mitigate their damages, the jury may reduce the compensation accordingly. 3. Employment Law Cases: In certain employment disputes, such as wrongful termination or discrimination cases, this instruction applies. It clarifies that employees have a duty to mitigate damages by actively searching for new employment opportunities. If an employee fails to make reasonable efforts to find a comparable job, they might not be entitled to receive full compensation for the income they lost due to the wrongful termination. 4. Breach of Contract Cases: This variety of the jury instruction is applicable to breach of contract claims. It notifies the jury that when a party breaches a contract, the non-breaching party must minimize the damages by taking reasonable steps to reduce their losses. This can involve finding an alternative supplier, seeking substitute goods, and avoiding unnecessary expenses. Conclusion: North Dakota Jury Instruction — 1.1 Duty to Mitigate In General emphasizes the duty of a plaintiff to minimize the damages caused by a defendant's actions. It instructs the jury to consider whether the injured party made reasonable efforts to mitigate their losses. The types of cases in which this instruction is relevant include ordinary negligence, personal injury, employment law, and breach of contract.