North Dakota Jury Instruction — Uttering A Forged Endorsement: Uttering a forged endorsement is a criminal offense in North Dakota. This jury instruction guides the jury on how to evaluate a case involving the act of using or possessing a falsified endorsement on a document. The instruction assists the jury in understanding the elements of the offense, the burden of proof, and the applicable legal principles. Keywords: North Dakota, jury instruction, uttering a forged endorsement, criminal offense, document, falsified endorsement, elements of the offense, burden of proof, legal principles. Types of North Dakota Jury Instruction — Uttering A Forged Endorsement: 1. Basic Instruction: This type of instruction provides a general overview of the offense and its essential elements. It guides the jury in understanding the definition of uttering a forged endorsement and how it applies to the specific case. 2. Intent Instruction: This instruction focuses on the mental state required for the offense. It explains that the defendant must have knowingly used or possessed a falsified endorsement with the intention to deceive or defraud. 3. Possession Instruction: This instruction addresses the concept of possession of a falsified endorsement. It clarifies that merely possessing a document with a forged endorsement can be sufficient to establish the offense, even if the defendant did not directly use or attempt to use it. 4. Identification Instruction: This type of instruction assists the jury in recognizing the elements necessary to identify a forged endorsement. It explains the various indicators or characteristics that may suggest the endorsement is falsified, such as discrepancies in handwriting, missing security features, or alterations on the document. 5. Causation Instruction: This instruction pertains to the causal link between the defendant's actions and the potential harm caused. It emphasizes that the defendant's uttering of the forged endorsement must have been a substantial factor in bringing about the intended consequences, such as financial loss or harm to another party. 6. Defenses Instruction: This instruction outlines potential defenses that the defendant may raise in a case involving uttering a forged endorsement. It may cover defenses such as lack of knowledge or intent, mistake, duress, consent, or any other argument that could potentially exonerate the defendant. By providing detailed guidance and explanations, the North Dakota Jury Instruction — Uttering A Forged Endorsement ensures that the jury is well-informed about the offense and its applicable legal principles, thus enabling them to reach a fair and just verdict.