This form is used to set forth the terms and conditions stipulated to in order for parties to compromise for settlement on a claim brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act. This form is used pursuant to pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2677.
North Dakota Stipulation for Compromise Settlement Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2677 is a legal document used in North Dakota to settle claims arising from civil actions against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTA). The FTA allows individuals to sue the United States for monetary damages resulting from the negligent or wrongful acts of federal employees acting within the scope of their employment. However, before a lawsuit can proceed, a claimant must first file an administrative claim with the responsible federal agency. In cases where the government agency admits liability, the parties may choose to reach a compromise settlement instead of going to court. This is where the North Dakota Stipulation for Compromise Settlement Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2677 comes into play. The stipulation is a legally binding agreement between the claimant and the federal agency involved, outlining the terms of the settlement. It provides a framework for resolving the claim, including the amount of compensation to be paid to the claimant, any conditions attached to the settlement, and the release of the claimant's rights to further legal action. Keywords: North Dakota, Stipulation for Compromise Settlement, 28 U.S.C. Section 2677, Federal Tort Claims Act, civil actions, administrative claim, liability, compromise settlement, claimant, federal agency, lawsuit, monetary damages, settlement agreement. Different types of North Dakota Stipulation for Compromise Settlement Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2677 may include: 1. Personal Injury Settlement: This stipulation applies when an individual has suffered physical or emotional harm due to the negligence of a federal employee. 2. Property Damage Settlement: This type of stipulation is used when a claimant seeks compensation for damage to their property caused by the federal government's actions or negligence. 3. Medical Malpractice Settlement: If a claimant alleges that a federal healthcare provider's negligence resulted in their injury or harm, a stipulation specific to medical malpractice may be drafted. 4. Wrongful Death Settlement: In cases where the negligence of a federal employee leads to the death of an individual, a stipulation tailored to wrongful death claims would be necessary. 5. Contract Dispute Settlement: Although less common, there might be situations where the dispute between a claimant and a federal agency involves breach of contract or similar issues requiring a specialized stipulation. Note: The specific types of stipulations may vary depending on the nature of the claim and the facts surrounding the case. It is essential to consult with an attorney or legal expert familiar with North Dakota laws to determine the precise requirements and stipulations applicable to a particular compromise settlement.North Dakota Stipulation for Compromise Settlement Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2677 is a legal document used in North Dakota to settle claims arising from civil actions against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTA). The FTA allows individuals to sue the United States for monetary damages resulting from the negligent or wrongful acts of federal employees acting within the scope of their employment. However, before a lawsuit can proceed, a claimant must first file an administrative claim with the responsible federal agency. In cases where the government agency admits liability, the parties may choose to reach a compromise settlement instead of going to court. This is where the North Dakota Stipulation for Compromise Settlement Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2677 comes into play. The stipulation is a legally binding agreement between the claimant and the federal agency involved, outlining the terms of the settlement. It provides a framework for resolving the claim, including the amount of compensation to be paid to the claimant, any conditions attached to the settlement, and the release of the claimant's rights to further legal action. Keywords: North Dakota, Stipulation for Compromise Settlement, 28 U.S.C. Section 2677, Federal Tort Claims Act, civil actions, administrative claim, liability, compromise settlement, claimant, federal agency, lawsuit, monetary damages, settlement agreement. Different types of North Dakota Stipulation for Compromise Settlement Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2677 may include: 1. Personal Injury Settlement: This stipulation applies when an individual has suffered physical or emotional harm due to the negligence of a federal employee. 2. Property Damage Settlement: This type of stipulation is used when a claimant seeks compensation for damage to their property caused by the federal government's actions or negligence. 3. Medical Malpractice Settlement: If a claimant alleges that a federal healthcare provider's negligence resulted in their injury or harm, a stipulation specific to medical malpractice may be drafted. 4. Wrongful Death Settlement: In cases where the negligence of a federal employee leads to the death of an individual, a stipulation tailored to wrongful death claims would be necessary. 5. Contract Dispute Settlement: Although less common, there might be situations where the dispute between a claimant and a federal agency involves breach of contract or similar issues requiring a specialized stipulation. Note: The specific types of stipulations may vary depending on the nature of the claim and the facts surrounding the case. It is essential to consult with an attorney or legal expert familiar with North Dakota laws to determine the precise requirements and stipulations applicable to a particular compromise settlement.
