Title: Understanding a North Dakota Complaint regarding Action by Bank to Recover on Note After Application of Security Proceeds Introduction: In North Dakota, a complaint regarding action by a bank to recover on a note after the application of security proceeds refers to a legal document filed by a debtor (defendant) in response to a bank's attempt to collect the outstanding balance on a loan, even after the bank has already applied the proceeds from the debtor's provided security or collateral. This detailed description will provide insights into the various types of North Dakota complaints that can be raised in such cases. Types of North Dakota Complaints regarding Action by Bank to Recover on Note After Application of Security Proceeds: 1. Improper Allocation Complaint: This type of complaint argues that the bank has erroneously applied the security proceeds to a portion of the loan that should not have been credited or applied. The debtor may claim that the bank should have allocated the proceeds differently, altering the balance claimed to be outstanding. 2. Overdue Balance Dispute Complaint: Here, the debtor challenges the bank's claim of an overdue balance on the note after the application of security proceeds. The complaint may assert that the bank failed to properly credit the debtor's account with the proceeds received or that the bank miscalculated the remaining balance, leading to an incorrect overdue balance claim. 3. Inadequate Notice Complaint: This type of complaint focuses on the bank's alleged failure to provide proper notice as required by North Dakota law. Debtors may argue that they were not adequately informed about the bank's intention to recover on the note after applying the security proceeds, violating their rights to due process. 4. Breach of Contract Complaint: In this type of complaint, the debtor asserts that the bank's actions violate the terms and conditions set forth in the loan agreement or security agreement. The complaint may highlight specific contractual clauses that the bank allegedly disregarded, leading to an unjustifiable attempt to recover on the remaining note balance. 5. Unfair Collection Practices Complaint: A debtor may file this type of complaint if they believe that the bank engaged in unfair or deceptive collection practices during the process of attempting to recover on the note after applying the security proceeds. This complaint may assert violations of state or federal laws, such as the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FD CPA). Conclusion: In North Dakota, when a bank attempts to recover on a note after applying security proceeds, debtors have the right to file various types of complaints. These complaints address issues such as improper allocation of security proceeds, disputes over overdue balances, inadequate notice, breach of contract, and unfair collection practices. It is crucial for debtors to consult legal counsel to determine the appropriate course of action and ensure their rights are protected throughout the legal process.