This form is a Special Verdict usable in cases involving misappropriation of commercial trade secrets.
North Dakota Special Verdict A special verdict in North Dakota is a legal term referring to a specific type of jury verdict that requires the jury to make factual findings and determine specific details of a case before reaching a final decision. It is a tool used by the court to guide the jury's decision-making process and ensure a more thorough and detailed analysis of the evidence presented. In North Dakota, there are different types or variations of the special verdict that can be used depending on the nature of the case: 1. General Special Verdict: This type of special verdict requires the jury to answer specific questions regarding disputed facts or issues in the case. The jury's responses to these questions provide the court with a clear understanding of the factual basis for their final decision. 2. Interrogatories Verdict: In this variation, the court provides the jury with a list of written interrogatories or questions pertaining to various elements of the case. The jury's responses to these interrogatories, along with their ultimate decision, help the court gain insight into the reasoning behind their verdict. 3. Liability Verdict: This special verdict type is commonly used in personal injury cases. It requires the jury to determine the liability of each party involved in the case. The jury provides findings on the percentage of fault attributed to each party, which then helps the court determine the appropriate distribution of damages. 4. Damages Verdict: In cases where damages are a significant factor, this special verdict requires the jury to calculate and specify the amount of damages to be awarded. The jury provides detailed findings on the economic and non-economic damages suffered by the plaintiff, assisting the court in delivering a fair and just verdict. 5. Comparative Fault Verdict: In situations where multiple parties may share some responsibility for an incident, this special verdict asks the jury to assign a percentage of fault to each party involved. These findings aid the court in determining the proportionate responsibility of each party and the resulting damages awarded. In summary, a special verdict in North Dakota is a legal mechanism utilized by the court to facilitate a more detailed determination of facts and issues before rendering a final decision. Various types of special verdicts, such as general special verdicts, interrogatories verdicts, liability verdicts, damages verdicts, and comparative fault verdicts, are available to provide greater clarity and guidance in different types of cases.North Dakota Special Verdict A special verdict in North Dakota is a legal term referring to a specific type of jury verdict that requires the jury to make factual findings and determine specific details of a case before reaching a final decision. It is a tool used by the court to guide the jury's decision-making process and ensure a more thorough and detailed analysis of the evidence presented. In North Dakota, there are different types or variations of the special verdict that can be used depending on the nature of the case: 1. General Special Verdict: This type of special verdict requires the jury to answer specific questions regarding disputed facts or issues in the case. The jury's responses to these questions provide the court with a clear understanding of the factual basis for their final decision. 2. Interrogatories Verdict: In this variation, the court provides the jury with a list of written interrogatories or questions pertaining to various elements of the case. The jury's responses to these interrogatories, along with their ultimate decision, help the court gain insight into the reasoning behind their verdict. 3. Liability Verdict: This special verdict type is commonly used in personal injury cases. It requires the jury to determine the liability of each party involved in the case. The jury provides findings on the percentage of fault attributed to each party, which then helps the court determine the appropriate distribution of damages. 4. Damages Verdict: In cases where damages are a significant factor, this special verdict requires the jury to calculate and specify the amount of damages to be awarded. The jury provides detailed findings on the economic and non-economic damages suffered by the plaintiff, assisting the court in delivering a fair and just verdict. 5. Comparative Fault Verdict: In situations where multiple parties may share some responsibility for an incident, this special verdict asks the jury to assign a percentage of fault to each party involved. These findings aid the court in determining the proportionate responsibility of each party and the resulting damages awarded. In summary, a special verdict in North Dakota is a legal mechanism utilized by the court to facilitate a more detailed determination of facts and issues before rendering a final decision. Various types of special verdicts, such as general special verdicts, interrogatories verdicts, liability verdicts, damages verdicts, and comparative fault verdicts, are available to provide greater clarity and guidance in different types of cases.
