Nebraska Objection is a type of legal argument used in the United States when a party objects to the introduction of evidence in a trial. It is a common objection in civil cases, as well as in criminal cases. The objection is based on a legal rule that evidence must be relevant to the case and must not be overly prejudicial. It is named after the case of Nebraska v. Nebraska, which established the legal principle that evidence must be relevant and not overly prejudicial. There are two types of Nebraska Objection: a general objection and a specific objection. A general objection is when a party objects to any evidence that is not related to the case. A specific objection is when a party objects to evidence that is related to the case, but that is overly prejudicial or that could be used to mislead the jury. In either case, the objecting party must explain their objection and provide reasons why the evidence should be excluded. The other party may then respond and present reasons why the evidence should be admitted. A judge will then make a ruling on whether the evidence should be admitted.