Nebraska Instruction to Jury that Refusal to Deliver Goods after Demand and Tender of Freight and Storage Charges can Constitute Conversion serves as an essential guideline for legal proceedings involving disputes regarding the delivery of goods, freight charges, and storage fees. In these cases, if a party refuses to deliver the goods despite a rightful demand and tender of payment for freight and storage charges, it can potentially be considered as an act of conversion. The instruction aims to inform the jury about the key aspects related to conversion and the various scenarios in which it may occur. Here are some examples of different types of Nebraska Instructions to Jury that Refusal to Deliver Goods after Demand and Tender of Freight and Storage Charges can Constitute Conversion: 1. Nebraska Instruction to Jury — Conversion by Failure to Deliver: In cases where a party refuses to deliver the goods after a valid demand has been made and there has been a proper tender of freight and storage charges, the jury will be instructed to consider this act as a potential conversion. 2. Nebraska Instruction to Jury — Conversion and Legal Obligations: This instruction emphasizes the legal obligations of parties involved in delivering goods. It explains that a refusal to deliver goods despite a rightful demand and tender of freight and storage charges may constitute conversion, implying that it is essential for the jury to carefully consider these factors when determining the outcome of the case. 3. Nebraska Instruction to Jury — Prima Facie Conversion through Refusal to Deliver: In situations where a demand for delivery has been made, along with a proper tender of freight and storage charges, the jury is informed that such refusal to deliver, without any justifiable reason, can establish a prima facie case of conversion. It indicates that the burden of proof then shifts to the party refusing delivery to provide a valid defense or justification for their actions. 4. Nebraska Instruction to Jury — Conversion and Compensation: This instruction highlights the potential consequences of conversion. It explains that if the jury finds that the refusal to deliver goods after demand and tender of freight and storage charges amounts to conversion, compensatory damages may be awarded to the injured party. These damages aim to compensate for the loss suffered due to the wrongful act. 5. Nebraska Instruction to Jury — Mitigation and Defenses in Conversion Cases: This instruction informs the jury about potential defenses and mitigating factors that the party accused of conversion may present. It emphasizes the importance of considering the evidence and arguments presented by both parties to ensure a fair and just verdict. In summary, Nebraska Instruction to Jury that Refusal to Deliver Goods after Demand and Tender of Freight and Storage Charges can Constitute Conversion consists of various instructions that help guide the jury through cases involving disputes over delivery, freight charges, and storage fees. It ensures that the jury understands the legal principles surrounding conversion and aids in reaching a well-informed verdict.