Nebraska Jury Instruction Impeachmenten— - Inconsistent Statement and Felony Conviction — Defendant Testifies With No Felony Conviction is a legal guideline that addresses the use of inconsistent statements and felony convictions to challenge the credibility of a defendant who testifies in court but does not have a felony conviction on their record. This instruction provides information to the jury about the potential impact of such evidence on the defendant's credibility and the weight it should be given when assessing their testimony. The purpose of this jury instruction is to ensure that the jury carefully considers the defendant's credibility and weighs the impact of any inconsistent statements along with the absence of a felony conviction. By instructing the jury on this matter, the court seeks to prevent any unfair prejudice that may arise from the introduction of these types of evidence and help the jury make an informed decision based on the facts presented. There are different types of Nebraska Jury Instruction Impeachmenten— - Inconsistent Statement and Felony Conviction — Defendant Testifies With No Felony Conviction. Some possible variations may include: 1. Standard Instruction: This is a general instruction that provides a clear explanation of the law regarding inconsistent statements and felony convictions when assessing the credibility of a defendant who testifies without a felony conviction. 2. Modified Instruction: In some cases, the court may modify the standard instruction to include specific language or additional factors relevant to the particular case, such as the nature or number of inconsistent statements made by the defendant or the significance of the absence of a felony conviction. 3. Prejudice Mitigation Instruction: This type of instruction may be given if the court believes that the introduction of inconsistent statements and the absence of a felony conviction may unduly prejudice the jury against the defendant. It aims to remind the jury to consider the evidence in a fair and unbiased manner, focusing on the defendant's testimony and the overall credibility assessment rather than solely on the impeaching evidence. 4. Expert Opinion Instruction: In some cases, if expert testimony is involved regarding the impact of inconsistent statements and the absence of a felony conviction, the jury instruction may include guidelines on how to evaluate such testimony and incorporate it into their overall assessment of the defendant's credibility. These different variations may be used as needed, depending on the specific circumstances of a case, but their purpose remains consistent — to guide the jury in assessing the credibility and weight of a defendant's testimony when impeaching evidence such as inconsistent statements and a lack of felony convictions are presented.