Are you inside a situation where you need papers for possibly enterprise or individual purposes almost every time? There are plenty of legal papers layouts available online, but locating ones you can trust isn`t straightforward. US Legal Forms provides a large number of kind layouts, just like the Nebraska Jury Instruction - False Claims Against The Government, which are created to fulfill federal and state specifications.
Should you be currently acquainted with US Legal Forms website and possess a free account, merely log in. Following that, you are able to down load the Nebraska Jury Instruction - False Claims Against The Government web template.
Unless you come with an profile and want to begin using US Legal Forms, follow these steps:
Discover all of the papers layouts you have bought in the My Forms food list. You can obtain a further duplicate of Nebraska Jury Instruction - False Claims Against The Government at any time, if required. Just go through the needed kind to down load or produce the papers web template.
Use US Legal Forms, probably the most comprehensive collection of legal forms, to save efforts and avoid mistakes. The support provides appropriately manufactured legal papers layouts which can be used for a range of purposes. Produce a free account on US Legal Forms and start producing your daily life a little easier.
If a lawyer, the lawyer's client, or a witness called by the lawyer, has offered material evidence and the lawyer comes to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures, including, if necessary, disclosure to the tribunal.
A party must persuade you, by the evidence presented in court, that what he or she is required to prove is more likely to be true than not true. This is referred to as "the burden of proof."
A hung jury is when the members of a jury are unable to reach a unanimous decision on whether or not the accused party is guilty beyond reasonable doubt. This occurs when there are opposing opinions among the jurors regarding the outcome of the case.
In its current form, Rule 30 requires that the court instruct the jury after the arguments of counsel. In some districts, usually where the state practice is otherwise, the parties prefer to stipulate to instruction before closing arguments.
When a party has the burden of proving any claim [or affirmative defense] by a preponderance of the evidence, it means you must be persuaded by the evidence that the claim [or affirmative defense] is more probably true than not true.
Reasonable doubt is insufficient evidence that prevents a judge or jury from convicting a defendant of a crime. If it cannot be proved without a doubt that a defendant in a criminal case is guilty, then that person should not be convicted.
In criminal cases, the prosecution is required to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This means that the evidence presented must be so convincing that no reasonable person could have any doubts about the defendant's guilt.
This means that the prosecution must convince the jury that there is no other reasonable explanation that can come from the evidence presented at trial. In other words, the jury must be virtually certain of the defendant's guilt in order to render a guilty verdict.